Regulation must match advances in nanotechnology

Nanoparticles can help purify water Copyright: Accelrys

By: T.V. Padma

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Regulation must match advances in nanotechnology</h1>
<h4>By: T.V. Padma</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p>[BANGALORE] A top Indian scientist has asked policymakers to ensure that the regulation of nanotechnology keeps pace with advances in the field.</p>
<p>"We should not underestimate regulatory science," Maharaj Krishan Bhan, secretary of India’s department of biotechnology, cautioned scientists from Germany, India, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States at a nanotechnology conference in Bangalore last week (8-9 December).</p>
<p>Bhan said that regulation did not merely imply processes, such as rules and regulations, but also ‘regulatory science’ in which scientists have detailed knowledge of health and environment risks.</p>
<p>"Institutions and scientists <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/news/safety-ignored-in-nanotech-rush-warn-experts.html">must do regulatory science</a> and give us tools for updating knowledge in this area," Bhan said.</p>
<p>Of interest at the conference were nanoparticles of up to 100 nanometres (a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre) that show promise in improving medicine, food, agriculture and solar cells.  </p>
<p>In medicine their applications range from targeted drug delivery; the discovery of ‘biomarkers’ to guide doctors in detecting disorders; the regeneration of nerve and cartilage tissues; and the repair of eye and spinal cord injuries.</p>
<p>Nanoparticles can help purify water, cleanse wastewaters, and act as sensors for toxic gases and explosives.</p>
<p>The conference also heard that, despite an overall increase in India’s publications and patents in nanotechnology, the country still lags behind developed countries and China.</p>
<p>Between 2000 and 2007, China and India witnessed similar growth rates in publications (a little over 30 per cent), but India’s growth rate in the number of patents granted in the sector was only six per cent compared with China’s 31 per cent, observed Komal Shah, director of the Mumbai-based Innovar IP Consulting Group, which helps Indian industry with patents services.</p>
<p>"We have a huge pool of individual scientists in nanoscience and nanotechnology, but <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/news/lack-of-industry-links-keeping-indian-nanotech-sma.html">Indian industry is not the beneficiary</a>," Shah observed.</p>
<p>Indian industry lags behind comparable countries in research and development (R&D) investment, Shah said. For example, of the 35,000 patent applications filed in the Indian patent office, 20 per cent are by domestic Indian companies and 80 per cent by publicly-funded institutes. In comparison, of the 250,000 patent applications filed in China so far, 62 per cent have come from domestic companies. </p>
<p>G. Sundararajan, director of the International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials, said: "Indian industry is cash-rich but not many are into R&D. As industry matures, we have to develop technology and commercialise it ourselves."</p>
<p>While industry in Japan and the US contributes to 75 per cent of R&D in nanoscience and nanotechnology, in India it contributes only 25 per cent, he said. Additionally, US investment in R&D stands at US$309 million, and Japan at US$159 million, but Indian investments are worth only US$43 million.</p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/regulation-must-match-advances-in-nanotechnology-1/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/regulation-must-match-advances-in-nanotechnology-1/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

[BANGALORE] A top Indian scientist has asked policymakers to ensure that the regulation of nanotechnology keeps pace with advances in the field.

"We should not underestimate regulatory science," Maharaj Krishan Bhan, secretary of India’s department of biotechnology, cautioned scientists from Germany, India, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States at a nanotechnology conference in Bangalore last week (8-9 December).

Bhan said that regulation did not merely imply processes, such as rules and regulations, but also ‘regulatory science’ in which scientists have detailed knowledge of health and environment risks.

"Institutions and scientists must do regulatory science and give us tools for updating knowledge in this area," Bhan said.

Of interest at the conference were nanoparticles of up to 100 nanometres (a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre) that show promise in improving medicine, food, agriculture and solar cells.

In medicine their applications range from targeted drug delivery; the discovery of ‘biomarkers’ to guide doctors in detecting disorders; the regeneration of nerve and cartilage tissues; and the repair of eye and spinal cord injuries.

Nanoparticles can help purify water, cleanse wastewaters, and act as sensors for toxic gases and explosives.

The conference also heard that, despite an overall increase in India’s publications and patents in nanotechnology, the country still lags behind developed countries and China.

Between 2000 and 2007, China and India witnessed similar growth rates in publications (a little over 30 per cent), but India’s growth rate in the number of patents granted in the sector was only six per cent compared with China’s 31 per cent, observed Komal Shah, director of the Mumbai-based Innovar IP Consulting Group, which helps Indian industry with patents services.

"We have a huge pool of individual scientists in nanoscience and nanotechnology, but Indian industry is not the beneficiary," Shah observed.

Indian industry lags behind comparable countries in research and development (R&D) investment, Shah said. For example, of the 35,000 patent applications filed in the Indian patent office, 20 per cent are by domestic Indian companies and 80 per cent by publicly-funded institutes. In comparison, of the 250,000 patent applications filed in China so far, 62 per cent have come from domestic companies.

G. Sundararajan, director of the International Advanced Research Centre for Powder Metallurgy and New Materials, said: "Indian industry is cash-rich but not many are into R&D. As industry matures, we have to develop technology and commercialise it ourselves."

While industry in Japan and the US contributes to 75 per cent of R&D in nanoscience and nanotechnology, in India it contributes only 25 per cent, he said. Additionally, US investment in R&D stands at US$309 million, and Japan at US$159 million, but Indian investments are worth only US$43 million.