Bringing science and development together through original news and analysis

  • Ugandan science needs a ministry

A Ugandan ST ministry would provide the country's science base with the clarity, cohesion and direction it needs, says Edward Tujunirwe.

Uganda has heard passionate calls from scientists, politicians and the public to establish a Ministry of Science and Technology in the past few months.

These calls have been reflected in several government policies the country's National Development Plan, recently endorsed by the cabinet, explicitly asks for a science and technology (ST) ministry, for example.

And yet there are no signs that this ministry will be created any time soon.

Some critics argue that the move would destabilise the current ST setup and derail the implementation of key programmes.

But creating an effectively managed ST ministry could be a real strategic investment. Uganda is the only country in East Africa to operate without such a ministry and if we do not make the move soon, we risk trailing behind in scientific and technological development.

Poor coordination

The government already recognises that ST are vital in stimulating socioeconomic development. Science education is now compulsory in the first four years of secondary school, and the government prioritises science students at public universities for state funding.

But, more broadly, Uganda's ST are characterised by inadequate public and private funding, low levels of new technology development and adoption, and too few staff.

ST in Uganda are poorly coordinated, with badly administered institutions housed across several ministries and given varying even conflicting mandates.

An independent ministry could provide a powerful technical and administrative tool for creating a coherent ST programme that is more effective, relevant, accessible and productive.

It would enable the government to effectively coordinate and supervise ST activities, galvanise and consolidate the achievements made so far, and accelerate socioeconomic development.

Ensuring buy-in

But a well-coordinated, functional, ST system led by an independent minister is impossible without clear leadership, a strong advocacy strategy and consensus among the diverse stakeholders.

Defending the creation of a new ministry will not be easy Uganda's development partners, and even the president himself, have already raised concerns about the ever-increasing cost of public administration. A science ministry would push Uganda's number of ministries over that allowed by the constitution.

So is effective political engagement. Only the president has the power to create a new cabinet post while cabinet members themselves are subject to parliamentary approval, the decision to create (or disband) a ministry is not.

So whether we succeed in advocating for the new ST ministry will depend in part on how closely the president listens to us. Regrettably, there are few scientists and engineers actively involved in Ugandan politics even fewer that have the president's ear and not all those that are agree a new ministry is necessary.

As scientists, we can only assist our leader by providing him with timely, reliable and credible information. The decision to act (or not) will be his alone but we cannot expect him to act in our favour if we cannot reach consensus or ensure our voices are heard.

On the plus side, the president has often alluded to the need to strengthen Ugandan ST and publicly complained about 'bottlenecks' in the system. He has also personally initiated several well-intentioned schemes, including the Presidential Initiative on Banana Industrial Development, the Presidential Support to Scientists programme and the Uganda Millennium Science Initiative.

What we need now is a ministry ideally led by the president himself for at least the first five years to oversee and manage the national ST environment in the country.

Learning by example

We need not reinvent the wheel more than 100 countries around the world have ST ministries and many are making real progress, including those in India, Israel and South Africa.

A close evaluation of these would inform our strategy.

We can, and should, learn from the choices made by others. That doesn't mean we should import their models wholesale. Rather, we must skilfully and strategically adjust these to address our national concerns and priorities.

Republish
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.