[BRUSSELS] The emerging global physics for development movement needs a common strategy to define the field, a conference has heard. This would enable practitioners to work towards common goals of improving physics education and research, with a view to using results in development.
The importance of such a strategy emerged at the First European Physical Society (EPS) Conference on Physics for Development in Brussels, Belgium, last week (1112 October).
Carlo Iorio conference co-organiser, deputy chairman of the EPS Physics for Development group, and a physicist at the Universit Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium said the conference aimed to establish networks for providing low-cost, locally-produced equipment for physics teaching and research. It also hoped to facilitate North-South research fellowships to reduce brain drain issues in the global South.
Another goal was to create an exchange hub, bringing together organisations and academics to motivate good students to be there for the development of the country, said Iorio.
But it has emerged that EPS conference participants lack a common definition for the physics for development slogan.
Different researchers have different interpretations of the slogan, said Elena Sassi, a researcher at the University of Naples Federico II, Italy, who works to build capacity amongst students at Gulu University, Uganda.
Franois Piuzzi conference co-organiser and chairman of the EPS Physics for Development group said that a way forward could include: building research networks based around specific projects; bringing together academics already working in this field; and setting up a website to host physics for development resources.
Physics has the potential to transform development in a range of areas, from medicine to water and sanitation. Examples cited during the conference included solar energy and medical equipment programmes in Africa.
Ernst van Groningen, programme director at Uppsala Universitys International Science Programme, in Sweden, said the EPS may need a strategic document similar to that launched by the Astronomy for Development community to say what it is that [the] physics for development [community] wants to do.
But last weeks meeting concluded with no such document.
Claus Madsen, senior advisor for international science policy at the European Southern Observatory, and Astronomy for the Developing World strategy presenter at the EPS meeting, said that while the Astronomy for Development strategy was not a major shift in working practice it had successfully galvanised support for astronomy with the specific aim of fostering development.
One of the strategys key motivations was to see whats out there, what is working, and whether we can pull it together into some coherent system, Madsen said. Analyses of relevant data, such as on national education systems, gave us a clear picture of what would be realistic in a certain region or country, he added.
While this methodology could be applicable to physics which can lay claim to supporting development in a much wider and stronger sense than astronomy can physics may have a harder time matching the astronomy communitys key asset: the quality of being inspirational.
Physics is also a wider, less tightly-knit community than astronomy factors which could also hamper the development of a shared physics for development strategy.
Participants agreed to hold a second conference, possibly under the auspices of the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in Trieste, Italy, at one of ICTPs Physware workshops for tertiary physics education in developing countries. At this second conference, participants would agree a regular, biennial meeting, with the third conference earmarked to be held in Africa.
Iorio added that an EPS-sponsored conference in December 2013 in Cameroon would also help contribute to driving the agenda forward and delegates were also invited to forthcoming meetings of the African Physical Society, where similar themes would be on the agenda, according to its vice-president Paul Woafo.