Bringing science and development together through news and analysis

  • Cheap dipstick can detect foot and mouth disease


A dipstick that can test for foot and mouth disease has been developed by Chinese scientists, who say it is the first for the disease.

Foot and mouth is a highly contagious animal disease caused by a virus. It leads to severe weight loss in cloven-hoofed animals such as pigs, cattle and sheep and is considered the most economically threatening livestock disease worldwide. It does not affect humans.

The test consists of a strip which, when it comes into contact with pig's blood detects a particular antibody that the pig produces as a response to infection with the disease.

"We also tested sheep, cow and guinea pig sera using this strip — they gave positive results," said lead researcher Suzhen Yang of the College of Veterinary Medicine at Henan Agricultural University in China.

"The successful development of the strip has not only provided a rapid, specific, sensitive and simple antibody detection method, but also established a new and practical instrument for animal disease antibodies monitoring," Yang said, adding that it is much cheaper than other methods.

However, critics pointed out that the test fails to differentiate between animals producing the antibody because they are infected, and those that do so because they have been vaccinated. Also, it can only detect one of seven different virus serotypes — serotype O.

"A dipstick test for antibodies to serotype O could be of value for foot and mouth disease control in endemic countries," said David Paton, Foot and Mouth Disease Programme Leader at the UK-based Institute for Animal Health.

However, he said that a test that detects the virus that causes the disease, rather than one that detects antibodies to it, is of "primary importance".

"For large scale surveys of vaccine induced immunity, lab-based serology is more appropriate. However, tests on individual animals prior to sale or movement could benefit from a simple, pen-side technique.  

He said the test might be more useful for assessing the efficacy of vaccination programmes.

The study was published in Journal of Virological Methods (2 May)


Journal of Virological Methods Volume 165, Issue 2, May 2010,

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.