12/05/08

UNAIDS out of touch and should be closed down

The HIV industry: "too big and out of control" Copyright: Flickr/Max_Thinks_Sees

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>UNAIDS out of touch and should be closed down</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>The mandate of UNAIDS — the UN programme for HIV/AIDS — is wrong and harmful, and the programme should be closed down rapidly, says Roger England in the <em>British Medical Journal</em>.</span></p>
<p><span>England points out that HIV causes 3.7 per cent of mortality and kills fewer people than pneumonia or diabetes, yet receives 25 per cent of international healthcare aid and a big chunk of domestic expenditure.</span></p>
<p><span>He says this has resulted in wasting vast sums of funding on esoteric disciplines instead of beefing up public health capacity.</span></p>
<p><span>UNAIDS is calling for huge increases in its funding — from US$9 billion today to US$54 billion by 2015. </span></p>
<p><span>England says the programme is out of touch with reality, and its single-issue advocacy is harming health systems and diverting resources from other diseases.</span></p>
<p><span>But moves to reprioritise HIV/AIDS will be resisted, he says, because the global HIV industry has grown too big and out of control.</span></p>
<p><span>"We have created a monster with too many vested interests and reputations at stake, too many single issue NGOs, too many relatively well paid HIV staff in affected countries, and too many rock stars with AIDS support as a fashion accessory."</span></p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/336/7652/1072" rel="noopener noreferrer"><span>Link to full article in <em>British Medical Journal</em></span></a></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/unaids-out-of-touch-and-should-be-closed-down/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/unaids-out-of-touch-and-should-be-closed-down/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

The mandate of UNAIDS — the UN programme for HIV/AIDS — is wrong and harmful, and the programme should be closed down rapidly, says Roger England in the British Medical Journal.

England points out that HIV causes 3.7 per cent of mortality and kills fewer people than pneumonia or diabetes, yet receives 25 per cent of international healthcare aid and a big chunk of domestic expenditure.

He says this has resulted in wasting vast sums of funding on esoteric disciplines instead of beefing up public health capacity.

UNAIDS is calling for huge increases in its funding — from US$9 billion today to US$54 billion by 2015.

England says the programme is out of touch with reality, and its single-issue advocacy is harming health systems and diverting resources from other diseases.

But moves to reprioritise HIV/AIDS will be resisted, he says, because the global HIV industry has grown too big and out of control.

"We have created a monster with too many vested interests and reputations at stake, too many single issue NGOs, too many relatively well paid HIV staff in affected countries, and too many rock stars with AIDS support as a fashion accessory."

Link to full article in British Medical Journal