GMO import ban caught in crossfire

By: Fred Pearce

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>GMO import ban caught in crossfire</h1>
<h4>By: Fred Pearce</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><P>The UN Biosafety Protocol — which allows countries to ban imports of food containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) if they fear it might have an “adverse effect” on biological diversity or human health — comes into force today (11 September 2003). </P><br />
<P>But as it does so, the right to impose such bans is being attacked by a US action launched in August against the European Union. The United States — which is not party to the protocol — claims that a five-year-old European ban on food containing GMOs is a breach of another set of international rules, the World Trade Organisation’s requirements for free trade. </P><br />
<P>Meanwhile Tewolde Egziabher, director of Ethiopia’s Environmental Protection Agency and one of the architects of the Biosafety Protocol, argues that the US action is designed to intimidate African countries, which want to use the protocol to set up their own systems for regulating imports of GM food.</P><br />
<P><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994147" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full article on NewScientist.com</A></P></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/gmo-import-ban-caught-in-crossfire/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/gmo-import-ban-caught-in-crossfire/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

The UN Biosafety Protocol — which allows countries to ban imports of food containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) if they fear it might have an “adverse effect” on biological diversity or human health — comes into force today (11 September 2003).

But as it does so, the right to impose such bans is being attacked by a US action launched in August against the European Union. The United States — which is not party to the protocol — claims that a five-year-old European ban on food containing GMOs is a breach of another set of international rules, the World Trade Organisation’s requirements for free trade.

Meanwhile Tewolde Egziabher, director of Ethiopia’s Environmental Protection Agency and one of the architects of the Biosafety Protocol, argues that the US action is designed to intimidate African countries, which want to use the protocol to set up their own systems for regulating imports of GM food.

Link to full article on NewScientist.com