IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri said negotiators attending the UN’s 2015 climate conference this time next year, where global agreement on climate change is due to be agreed, must “take a little closer view of the science” and take decisive action.  And one of the report’s findings is that, to keep warming within manageable limits, we may well need to phase out fossil fuel use by 2100. 
Under these circumstances, science has two roles: warning of the consequences of ‘business as usual’ and outlining possible solutions.
The synthesis report calls for a radical increase in global low-carbon electricity generation, including renewables and nuclear, from about 30 per cent today to “more than 80 per cent” by 2050. Statistical climate models suggest that keeping warming to below two degrees Celsius will require the concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases to be kept below the equivalent of 450 parts per million of carbon dioxide. The report warns that most models predict that, without carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, this will be impossible to achieve. A few models do suggest it will be possible without CCS, but only if “fossil fuel power generation without CCS is phased out almost entirely by 2100”.
What about the solutions side? Mark Jaccard, an environmental economist at Simon Fraser University in Canada, has made a strong case that global energy scenarios will remain heavily carbon-dependent until at least 2050.  Poor countries will continue to expand their energy use if they can. If they have coal, they will burn it.
“What if CCS cannot deliver improvements quickly and reliably enough, at the scale needed? Then renewables become even more essential, and the choices get harder and costlier.”
This will also be true for big industrialising economies such as China, India and South Africa, each of which is coal-rich. Sustainable development research centre the Wuppertal Institute has carefully studied these three countries, showing both the possibilities and difficulties involved with large-scale coal-powered energy generation.  It shows that making cleaner the fuel burnt by India and China — together home to getting on for three billion people — is of huge importance.
In general, poorer countries should not be denied the possibility of lifting their people out of extreme poverty. To do this, they need to use more energy, and they will use whatever is available at a reasonable price.
So several things are needed. We have to end subsidies on fossil fuel production, which act as perverse incentives and distort markets by favouring carbon-based fuels. And CCS technology needs to be developed and applied, not only in rich countries, but also in emerging economies. The technology needs to be shared internationally.
But what if CCS cannot deliver improvements quickly and reliably enough, at the scale needed? Then renewables — already a vital part of the energy mix — become even more essential, and the choices get harder and costlier.
Roger Williamson is an independent consultant and visiting fellow at the Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex, United Kingdom. Previous positions include organising nearly 80 international policy conferences for the UK Foreign Office and being head of policy and campaigns at Christian Aid.
 Leaders must study science assessment, IPCC says (Reportingclimatescience.com, 2 November 2014)
 Steve Connor Climate change 'final warning' as IPCC report pushes for fossil fuel phase-out by 2100 (The Independent, 2 November 2014)
 Mark Jaccard Sustainable fossil fuels (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
 Prospects of carbon capture and storage technologies (CCS) in emerging economies (Wuppertal Institute, June 2012)