24/05/06

Genetic clues to new ferocity of little-known virus

Chikungunya virus is transmitted between people by the mosquito Aedes aegypti Copyright: CDC

By: M. Sreelata

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Genetic clues to new ferocity of little-known virus</h1>
<h4>By: M. Sreelata</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><P2>Research published yesterday (23 May) could help explain why a little-known virus recently became rampant, infecting nearly one million people in an unprecedented disease outbreak that is still raging.</P><br />
<P>The study in PLoS Medicine suggests that the chikungunya virus has mutated in a way that makes it better at infecting the mosquitoes that spread the virus to people.</P><br />
<P>Last year, the virus began to infect people living in the Comoros Islands in the Indian Ocean before spreading to the nearby islands of Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Réunion and the Seychelles. </P><br />
<P>The virus causes fever and joint pain but is not usually fatal. It has infected one-third of Réunion’s population of 790,000 and, since December 2005, about 180,000 people in southern India. </P><br />
<P>The authors of the new study, led by Sylvain Brisse of France’s Pasteur Institute, identified the entire genetic sequence of virus samples from six patients in Réunion and the Seychelles. </P><br />
<P>They also sequenced a viral gene called E1 from samples taken from an additional 127 patients in Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Réunion and the Seychelles. </P><br />
<P>The results show that the chikungunya outbreak began with a strain related to East-African forms of the virus that then developed into several distinct variants.</P><br />
<P>The strain now dominant differs genetically from those involved in earlier outbreaks and this, say the researchers, could explain why the virus has become more aggressive. </P><br />
<P>In particular, they say, two changes to the structure of E1 could make the virus more likely to enter mosquito cells and replicate after the insect has fed on the blood of an infected person.</P><br />
<P>The virus was first recorded in 1952 in Tanzania and gets its name from a Swahili word meaning ‘that which bends up’ — a reference to the stooped posture of infected people whose joints swell up. </P><br />
<P>Since then periodic outbreaks have hit parts of Africa and Asia. The virus is not usually fatal, but deaths have been reported during the current outbreak, raising concerns that the virus’s genetic changes have also made it more deadly.</P><br />
<P>Experiments are now underway to test which of these features might be responsible for the apparent increase in the virus’s ability to infect people and cause disease.</P><br />
<P><a  href="http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pmed.0030263" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full paper in PLoS Medicine</A></P>Reference: PLoS Medicine 3, e263 (2006)<BR><BR></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/genetic-clues-to-new-ferocity-of-littleknown-viru/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/genetic-clues-to-new-ferocity-of-littleknown-viru/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

Research published yesterday (23 May) could help explain why a little-known virus recently became rampant, infecting nearly one million people in an unprecedented disease outbreak that is still raging.

The study in PLoS Medicine suggests that the chikungunya virus has mutated in a way that makes it better at infecting the mosquitoes that spread the virus to people.

Last year, the virus began to infect people living in the Comoros Islands in the Indian Ocean before spreading to the nearby islands of Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Réunion and the Seychelles.

The virus causes fever and joint pain but is not usually fatal. It has infected one-third of Réunion’s population of 790,000 and, since December 2005, about 180,000 people in southern India.

The authors of the new study, led by Sylvain Brisse of France’s Pasteur Institute, identified the entire genetic sequence of virus samples from six patients in Réunion and the Seychelles.

They also sequenced a viral gene called E1 from samples taken from an additional 127 patients in Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Réunion and the Seychelles.

The results show that the chikungunya outbreak began with a strain related to East-African forms of the virus that then developed into several distinct variants.

The strain now dominant differs genetically from those involved in earlier outbreaks and this, say the researchers, could explain why the virus has become more aggressive.

In particular, they say, two changes to the structure of E1 could make the virus more likely to enter mosquito cells and replicate after the insect has fed on the blood of an infected person.

The virus was first recorded in 1952 in Tanzania and gets its name from a Swahili word meaning ‘that which bends up’ — a reference to the stooped posture of infected people whose joints swell up.

Since then periodic outbreaks have hit parts of Africa and Asia. The virus is not usually fatal, but deaths have been reported during the current outbreak, raising concerns that the virus’s genetic changes have also made it more deadly.

Experiments are now underway to test which of these features might be responsible for the apparent increase in the virus’s ability to infect people and cause disease.

Link to full paper in PLoS Medicine

Reference: PLoS Medicine 3, e263 (2006)