Bringing science and development together through news and analysis

Conservation gets low share of tourist income
  • Conservation gets low share of tourist income

Copyright: Eric Miller / Panos

Speed read

  • Protected areas generate US$600 billion a year, but get only US$10 billion back

  • This gap should be closed to assist local and national development

  • Underspending on parks could endanger core services such as water supply

Global revenue from tourist visits to protected areas is high enough to allow more of this money to be spent on conservation, a study has found.

The paper estimated that tourism in protected areas around the world generates US$600 billion a year in revenue, but only US$10 billion is spent on conserving these areas and their biodiversity.

The scientists behind the study, who include Matt Walpole, a programme director at the UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre in the United Kingdom, call for higher spending on conservation of protected areas. The paper was published last month (24 February) in PLOS Biology.

“Conservation and wise use of biodiversity and natural capital can be a valuable contribution to local and national development, rather than a hindrance to it,” Walpole says. “The effectiveness of protected areas has been shown to be closely related to levels of investment.”

Walpole says current budgets for managing protected areas are often insufficient to do so effectively. But as the revenues these parks generate vastly exceed their running costs, there is scope to increase such spending, the researchers say.

The economic benefits of nature-based tourism should be an important consideration when making development choices, he says.

Each year, parks in Africa receive around 69 million visitors and those in Latin America 148 million visitors, compared with North America’s 3.3 billion visits (see graph). But their exclusivity makes visitors prepared to pay more, with average direct spending per visit in Africa as high as US$698, and US$311 in Latin America — compared with just US$103 per visit to North American parks, according to statistics gathered for the paper.

Walpole says that the once-in-a-lifetime feeling of a visit to natural treasures in the developing world — such as seeing mountain gorillas in Rwanda and Uganda or visiting Serengeti National Park in Tanzania — contribute to the extra economic potential of conservation for tourism.

He adds that conservation is an important pillar of sustainable development and “will be high on the political agenda in 2015 when the UN Sustainable Development Goals are expected to be finalised”.

Will Turner, chief scientist at US-based NGO Conservation International, says underspending on protected areas risks endangering essential things such as water supply that underpin economic growth. “We could up our funding to parks tenfold and it might be the greatest investment humanity has ever made,” he says.

Turner adds that steps are required to ensure that revenue generated by parks is fed back into the local economy. “Where tourism has worked, it’s been because it was done consciously, with clear planning and management to provide incentives for conservation, and by keeping the revenues local,” he says.

Link to the study in PLOS Biology


PLOS Biology doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002074 (2015)
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.