Climate assumptions ‘optimistic at best’

The IPCC has 'seriously underestimated' the technological challenges to stemming emissions Copyright: Flickr/davipt

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Climate assumptions ‘optimistic at best’</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has seriously underestimated the technological advances needed to stem carbon dioxide emissions, say Roger Pielke Jr, Tom Wigley and Christopher Green in <em>Nature</em>.</span></p>
<p><span>They describe the IPCC’s assumption that the majority of future emission reductions will occur spontaneously, in the absence of climate policies, as "optimistic at best and unachievable at worst". </span></p>
<p><span>Led by China and India, the world is on a development and energy path that will bring a surge in carbon dioxide emissions and can end only with a transformation of global energy systems, say the authors. </span></p>
<p><span>But such a transformation will take many decades, even if aggressive action on energy technology innovation is taken today.</span></p>
<p><span>The authors conclude that, instead of playing the "risky game" of assuming that technological advances will happen spontaneously, the IPCC should focus on how to create the conditions for innovation to occur.</span></p>
<p><span><a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v452/n7187/full/452531a.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer"><span>Link to full article in <em>Nature</em></span></a></span></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/climate-assumptions-optimistic-at-best/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/opinions/climate-assumptions-optimistic-at-best/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has seriously underestimated the technological advances needed to stem carbon dioxide emissions, say Roger Pielke Jr, Tom Wigley and Christopher Green in Nature.

They describe the IPCC’s assumption that the majority of future emission reductions will occur spontaneously, in the absence of climate policies, as "optimistic at best and unachievable at worst".

Led by China and India, the world is on a development and energy path that will bring a surge in carbon dioxide emissions and can end only with a transformation of global energy systems, say the authors.

But such a transformation will take many decades, even if aggressive action on energy technology innovation is taken today.

The authors conclude that, instead of playing the "risky game" of assuming that technological advances will happen spontaneously, the IPCC should focus on how to create the conditions for innovation to occur.

Link to full article in Nature