Mixed response to Uganda’s biotech progress

Uganda aims to use biotechnology to protect its banana crops from fungal disease Copyright: Bioagency

By: Peter Wamboga-Mugirya

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Mixed response to Uganda’s biotech progress</h1>
<h4>By: Peter Wamboga-Mugirya</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p>[ENTEBBE] Uganda has been both praised and criticised for its efforts to implement national biosafety policies, as it and its East African neighbours take steps to adopt a common approach to biotechnology.</p>
<p>Fee Chon Chong-Low of the United Nations Environment Programme Global Environment Facility (UNEP–GEF) made the comments at a meeting last week (19 September) in Kampala.</p>
<p>Fee was reporting on the progress of four African nations in implementing national biosafety frameworks, as required by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity’s Cartagena Protocol to protect biodiversity from any potential harm posed by genetically modified (GM) organisms.</p>
<p>She said Cameroon was leading the way, followed by Kenya, Uganda and Namibia, adding: "However, Uganda has performed a lot better than the rest in public sensitisation and encouraging public participation."</p>
<p>She praised Charles Mugoya for leading the development of Uganda’s national biosafety framework despite a lack of cooperation from some sections of the government.</p>
<p>But she expressed disappointment with Uganda’s failure to set up a biosafety ‘clearing house’ to share information on the movement of GM organisms.</p>
<p>She pointed out that US$20,000 had been allocated for this purpose but that there had been "no results".</p>
<p>Uganda and its neighbours in the East African Community — Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda — are moving towards a common political, legal and regulatory framework on biotechnology and biosafety.</p>
<p>The three nations are at different levels of biotechnology development, with Kenya carrying out confined field trials on GM maize, cotton and potato.</p>
<p>Uganda is preparing a confined field trial of bananas genetically modified to resist black sigatoka disease, a serious fungal condition. Tanzania, meanwhile is still developing its national biosafety framework.</p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/mixed-response-to-ugandas-biotech-progress/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/mixed-response-to-ugandas-biotech-progress/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

[ENTEBBE] Uganda has been both praised and criticised for its efforts to implement national biosafety policies, as it and its East African neighbours take steps to adopt a common approach to biotechnology.

Fee Chon Chong-Low of the United Nations Environment Programme Global Environment Facility (UNEP–GEF) made the comments at a meeting last week (19 September) in Kampala.

Fee was reporting on the progress of four African nations in implementing national biosafety frameworks, as required by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity’s Cartagena Protocol to protect biodiversity from any potential harm posed by genetically modified (GM) organisms.

She said Cameroon was leading the way, followed by Kenya, Uganda and Namibia, adding: "However, Uganda has performed a lot better than the rest in public sensitisation and encouraging public participation."

She praised Charles Mugoya for leading the development of Uganda’s national biosafety framework despite a lack of cooperation from some sections of the government.

But she expressed disappointment with Uganda’s failure to set up a biosafety ‘clearing house’ to share information on the movement of GM organisms.

She pointed out that US$20,000 had been allocated for this purpose but that there had been "no results".

Uganda and its neighbours in the East African Community — Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda — are moving towards a common political, legal and regulatory framework on biotechnology and biosafety.

The three nations are at different levels of biotechnology development, with Kenya carrying out confined field trials on GM maize, cotton and potato.

Uganda is preparing a confined field trial of bananas genetically modified to resist black sigatoka disease, a serious fungal condition. Tanzania, meanwhile is still developing its national biosafety framework.