11/09/03

Biodiversity treaty is ‘disastrous’ for scientists

By: Ted Agres

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Biodiversity treaty is ‘disastrous’ for scientists</h1>
<h4>By: Ted Agres</h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><P>When it was introduced in 1992, many scientists welcomed the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). But critics are now expressing concerns that the treaty is making developing countries paranoid of researchers wanting to steal their genetic resources.</P><br />
<P>Such a reaction is “an absolute disaster for scientists”, according to a senior UN official, as it draws no distinction between those who are bioprospecting for drugs and pharmaceuticals, and those conducting genuine academic research.</P><br />
<P>In light of these problems, the United Nations and the governments of some developing countries are starting to recognise the need to change the treaty’s implementation. But researchers warn that progress must be made quickly if countries are to avoid holding a completely distorted view of nature.</P><br />
<P><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030910/03" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/tracking/external/'+this.href);" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full article in <em>The Scientist</em></A></P></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/features/biodiversity-treaty-is-disastrous-for-scientists/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/features/biodiversity-treaty-is-disastrous-for-scientists/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

When it was introduced in 1992, many scientists welcomed the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). But critics are now expressing concerns that the treaty is making developing countries paranoid of researchers wanting to steal their genetic resources.

Such a reaction is “an absolute disaster for scientists”, according to a senior UN official, as it draws no distinction between those who are bioprospecting for drugs and pharmaceuticals, and those conducting genuine academic research.

In light of these problems, the United Nations and the governments of some developing countries are starting to recognise the need to change the treaty’s implementation. But researchers warn that progress must be made quickly if countries are to avoid holding a completely distorted view of nature.

Link to full article in The Scientist