Skip Navigation

Comunicación de la Ciencia: Influyendo a los generadores de políticas

Opiniones

  • Imprimir
  • Comentar

Climate assumptions 'optimistic at best'

Fuente: Nature

3 abril 2008 | EN | 中文

coal fired powered station, with cooling towers and chimney stacks

The IPCC has 'seriously underestimated' the technological challenges to stemming emissions

Flickr/davipt

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has seriously underestimated the technological advances needed to stem carbon dioxide emissions, say Roger Pielke Jr, Tom Wigley and Christopher Green in Nature.

They describe the IPCC's assumption that the majority of future emission reductions will occur spontaneously, in the absence of climate policies, as "optimistic at best and unachievable at worst".

Led by China and India, the world is on a development and energy path that will bring a surge in carbon dioxide emissions and can end only with a transformation of global energy systems, say the authors.

But such a transformation will take many decades, even if aggressive action on energy technology innovation is taken today.

The authors conclude that, instead of playing the "risky game" of assuming that technological advances will happen spontaneously, the IPCC should focus on how to create the conditions for innovation to occur.

Link to full article in Nature

AGREGUE SU COMENTARIO

Esta es su red: comparta sus opiniones sobre cualquiera de nuestros artículos agregando sus comentarios.

Usted debe registrarse para enviar un comentario o para escribir a un autor que haya aceptado recibir comentarios. Por favor entrarsuscribirse.

Todos los comentarios están sujetos a revisión. Nos reservamos el derecho de editar los comentarios que contengan un lenguaje inapropiado o inadecuado. SciDev.Net mantiene los derechos de autor de todo el material que se publica en el portal. Por favor lea las condiciones de uso para más detalles.

Todo el material de SciDev.Net se puede reproducir gratuitamente siempre que se de crédito a la fuente y al autor. Para más detalles ver Creative commons.

Volver Opiniones
Subir