Skip Navigation

Sub-Saharan Africa

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Research can help scientists engage the public

Source: Science

22 August 2012 | EN

Interview with scientist

Leshner says scientists should identify audience concerns and make messages relevant to them, but remain objective

Flickr/ILRI

The science of science communication is critical to ensuring that people can understand how research can affect their lives and communities, says Alan Leshner, chief executive officer of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and executive publisher of Science.

The public's understanding of science and technology is more important than ever, Leshner says, but "ethical, legal and social implications are emerging at a rate that seems to be outpacing society's capacity to make sense of the science."

He cites climate change, GM food and evolution as topics which policymakers and the public frequently "misunderstand, misrepresent or disregard." But for many researchers, engaging the public is an afterthought.

Empirical research is now yielding information about attitudes to scientific knowledge that can help scientists communicate more effectively, says Leshner. Some of the findings are surprising — showing, for example, that ideology and cultural background appear to have more of a bearing on an individual's stance on a particular issue, than knowledge of scientific 'fact'.

The way an issue is framed also tends to have a great impact on public views. For example, scientific claims about climate change are given more credit when the issue is framed as a challenge for technology rather than for regulation.

Leshner says that there are lessons to be learned from "antiscience forces", who often oversimplify to tell a convincing story, even when the science is distorted in the process.

Because research shows that people care more about what might affect them personally, Leshner suggests that the most useful approach is to identify a specific audience's concerns and make the message relevant to them in the most objective way possible. Yet to maintain credibility, scientists must "stick to the facts", he says.

Link to full article in Science

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top