Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
Source: PLoS Biology
16 April 2004 | EN
The movement towards open access to scientific literature has gathered increasing pace over the past year, partly fuelled by the launch last October of PLoS Biology, an open access journal produced by the Public Library of Science.
In this article, PLoS Biology challenges criticism that the publication fees or 'author charges' that it requires in order to provide free access to readers put an unfair burden on authors. Publication fees are not restricted to the open-access movement, it says, as authors regularly pay several thousands of dollars in page charges and other fees to traditional publishers.
Furthermore, the term 'author charges' is misleading, it says, as the fees are not borne purely by authors, but are shared by the many organisations that aim to disseminate scientific discoveries as widely as possible.
There is much to learn from Vietnamese approaches to reporting science and risk, says Son Kim Phan
Daily insights from the tenth public communication of science conference in Sweden
Add your comment
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.