Skip Navigation

Science Communication: R&D in Africa

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

A blow to promising HIV microbicide gel

Source: Science NOW

29 November 2011 | EN

First success, then failure — what is the future of tenofovir gel?

CAPRISA

A trial of a vaginal microbicide gel against HIV/AIDS has been stopped as early data have shown that it fails to reduce HIV infections.

This comes as a surprise as a previous trial of the same tenofovir gel, CAPRISA 004, found it reduced the risk of HIV infection by 39 per cent.

Researchers running the Vaginal and Oral Interventions to Control the Epidemic (VOICE) trial announced last week (25 November) that the gel worked no better than a placebo in around 2,000 women in trials in South Africa, Uganda and Zimbabwe.

"[The gel] didn't work a little bit. It just flat out didn't work," Sharon Hillier, a researcher at the University of Pittsburgh, United States, and head of the Microbicide Trials Network, which is conducting VOICE, told Science NOW.

Researchers suspect the VOICE trial may have failed because of a lack of adherence. "We've always worried that taking anything every day was going to be hard slog," said Hillier. "It's hard to do something every day for something you don't have yet."

Salim Abdool Karim, director of the Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), who led the earlier trial and who recently won an award for his work on tenofovir gel, said in a statement: "These results were totally unexpected as there is good evidence from laboratory research, animal studies and human trials showing that tenofovir gel prevents HIV. However, science does not always produce the answer we hope for."

The task now is to compare VOICE and CAPRISA 004 trials to find out what went wrong, said Connie Celum, an epidemiologist at the University of Washington, United States.

Research on microbicide gels has had many twists and turns, with an earlier gel, dubbed PRO 2000, first showing promise in 2009, then proving ineffective in clinical trials. Other gels failed to show protection in phase III trials, or even increased the risk of HIV.

Link to full article in Science NOW

Link to statement on discontinuation of use of tenofovir in trials

Link to CAPRISA statement

Comments (1)

Lopson Kay ( Botswana )

30 November 2011

Some of these agents will act like car seat belts, got to take precautionary measures at the same time when using them. By intense study and knowledge about mechanisms of infection, it will be tough for the gel to function properly once the barrier mechanism has been invaded: that is when the skin has been broken and leaving the system vulnerable. Only if the virus was an ‘organism’ just like the mosquitoes perhaps that was going to be a different story.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top