Skip Navigation

Science Communication

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Spotting unsound science in Pakistan

Pervez Hoodbhoy

Source: Express Tribune

1 June 2012 | EN

Astonishing science claims are being made in Pakistan, says Pervez Hoodbhoy.

lFlickr_JanneM

Astonishing science claims abound in the media. A self-taught engineer in Swat claims he can "fix Pakistan’s energy problem in three years" by splitting water to produce electricity.

In 2011, a Fellow of the Royal Society from Pakistan published an article saying that the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Programme experiment in Alaska caused floods and earthquakes in Pakistan.

A recent PhD thesis, titled 'A quantitative study on chromotherapy', guided by a 'meritorious professor' from the Higher Education Commission (HEC) and publication paid for by the HEC, elicited criticism from two Nobel prize winners for showing lack of understanding of the fundamentals of physics

Two top Pakistani scientists, Samar Mubarakmand and A. Q. Khan, neither of who is a mining engineer, meanwhile, have locked horns on whether coal from the Thar desert can be gasified underground in a commercially viable way

Mubarakmand believes the gasification project will turn Pakistan into a coal superpower.

But Khan says But Khan says the project is doomed to fail, and advses giving the Thar coal project to Shenhua Group of China.

This controversy cannot be resolved without transparency, data, and an independent evaluation by experts familiar with mining, chemistry, soil mechanics, and hydrology. Because none exist in Pakistan, perforce such experts should be sought in Australia, China, or elsewhere.

Common sense says that a detailed, independent feasibility plan is the very first step in a mega project.

Link to full article in the Express Tribune

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top