Skip Navigation

Science Communication: Health policy

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Population could keep climbing — and we must be prepared

Source: Yale Environment 360

20 September 2011 | EN

Indian woman and baby

Fertility rates remain high in poor parts of India

Flickr/ waterdotorg

Forecasts that global population will level off by the end of this century assume that birth and death rates will decline in poor countries as they develop — but this is far from certain, argues demographer Carl Haub.

Instead, the world could grow to 16 billion people — the high-end estimate of projections by the UN — and policymakers, demographers and environmentalists must prepare for this worst-case scenario and the stress it would put on the earth's resources such as water for drinking and agriculture, he says.

Population forecasts are based on three assumptions, modelled after how demographics changed in Europe: that fertility will continue to decline where it has and will start to decline where it hasn't; that this decline will be smooth and uninterrupted; and that it will result in each woman having two children or less.

But this is doubtful in many parts of the developing world, argues Haub. "The desire for more than two children — often many more than two — will remain an obstacle and will challenge assumptions that world population will level off or decline."

Sub-Saharan Africa, where the population is expected to rise from 880 million to two billion by 2050, is least likely to follow this trend, he says. Some countries, such as Congo and Kenya, have taken steps to stem population growth but fertility rate remains at 4.6–4.7 children per woman; in others, such as Nigeria and Senegal, rates have stalled after a period of decline. These trends suggest that population forecasts will prove too low.

Fertility rates remain lowest in educated, urban women, says Haub, but the challenge is to influence fertility rates in large rural populations that are often hard to reach — and often in the poorest countries or regions.

Link to full article in Yale Environment 360

Comments (1)

Roy H W Johnston ( Techne Associates | Ireland )

26 September 2011

Occasionally one encounters large-family situations where there are several aunts and uncles who remain childless from preference. Large families are usually child-friendly. The Chinese one-child model is highly problematic. Is anyone researching how a stable population might be the result of friendly social engineering?

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top