Skip Navigation

Science Communication: Fossil fuels

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

China can sink carbon in the soil

Source: China Dialogue

3 March 2009 | EN | 中文

Chinese farmland could store 1.2 tonnes of carbon per square metre

Flickr/Poorfish

Reducing carbon emissions in China doesn't have to be expensive — there is huge potential for storing carbon in the soil, says botanist Jiang Gaoming. 

There are 1.2 million square kilometres of farmland in China, with an average carbon storage capacity of 1.2 tonnes per square metre. 

But countries have a history of using, rather than managing, land, which depletes the organic content of soil and releases carbon dioxide into the environment. The organic content of soil in northeast China, for example, has fallen from 12 per cent to around one per cent over the last six or seven decades.

Increasing all of China's soil organic content by one per cent would be equivalent to absorbing about 30 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, he says.

Jiang suggests that farmers could use unwanted straw for animal fodder instead of burning it and rural households could use livestock dung to generate electricity. The waste from this process could itself be used as a high-quality fertiliser to increase the organic content of the soil, he adds.

Sequestering carbon in soil deserves policy support, concludes Jiang, so that it can ultimately become part of the global carbon-trading system.

Link to full article in China Dialogue

Comments (3)

Jorge Laine ( Venezuela )

9 March 2009

One way to increase soil organic content is to sow fossil hydrocarbon (FHC) coke as it were an agrichar. This may work as a biochar works, i.e., generating fertility as a terra-preta and capturing carbon that otherwise would be emmited to the atmosphere if the FHC was used as a fuel instead of as an agrichar. Pyrolysis of coal (China has plenty) will produce some energy from the volatiles, and abundant coke. If we take into account that the increase of soil fertility resulting from the use that coke as agrichar will result in an increase bioenergy production, thus, it may be worthwhile to consider this alternative.

orion ( France )

11 April 2009

I am afraid that it is storage in soil of organic carbon (for example straw) that is recommended. The CO2 of the atmosphere had been stored in the straw, and later in the soil, producing fertilisation of the soil, a good thing, as well as the diminution of CO2 (a nefast greenhouse gas) in the atmosphere. Putting mineral carbon in the soil seems to be of little benefit for both agriculture and climate.

orion ( France )

19 April 2009

Sorry, I probably partially misunderstood the comment of Jorge Laine : he is probably proposing some kind of "carbon sequestration" by burning in a power plant only the gaseous part of coal, keeping the residue (coke) to be processed by grinders for agriculture. Owing to the cost of the (often very dangerous) extraction of coal, the small (if any) fertilisation by coke powder will be ( I am afraid) cost uneffective.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top