Skip Navigation

Science Communication: Environmental policy

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Tropical countries struggle to engage with REDD+

Clara Rondonuwu

3 May 2012 | EN | ES | FR | 中文

Trees

Deforestation monitoring needs better capacity and access to technologies

Flickr/Papa Goiaba

Most tropical developing countries are struggling to monitor and report their greenhouse gas emissions from forest loss, and will need international support to implement the UN REDD+ scheme, according to a study.  

The Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) scheme aims to reverse forest cover loss and curb related carbon emissions by putting a financial value on stored carbon.

REDD+ was agreed at Cancun in 2010 and added conservation, sustainable forest management and enhancing forest carbon stocks to the REDD framework.

Countries voluntarily report back on their implementation of REDD+, but many lack the capacity to monitor forest loss and carbon emissions using key technologies such as satellite remote sensing, according to a paper in the May–June issue of Environmental Science and Policy.

The study ranked tropical developing countries according to their ability to implement REDD+, and found that few such countries had improved their monitoring capacity between 2005 and 2010, with some even losing capacity, such as Burkina Faso and Mozambique.

African countries were of most concern, as poor Internet connections and satellite coverage limit access to data. Meanwhile, mountainous countries such as Ecuador and Peru face technical challenges in analysing satellite images in areas with significant variations in altitude.

Just four of the 99 analysed countries — Argentina, China, India and Mexico — had very small capacity gaps. These countries had also managed to increase their total forest cover between 2005 and 2010, unlike countries with larger gaps, where there was a net loss of forests in the same period.

The paper recommends that the former group of countries could serve as advisors in South-South capacity building activities and regional collaboration efforts that could reduce the cost of accessing, processing and analysing remote sensing data.

The international community should invest in better access to satellite data, especially for Central African and American countries, the study further recommended. Monitoring of forest fires and vulnerable high-carbon areas, such as tropical peatland systems in South-East Asia which are being lost to oil palm and pulpwood plantations, was also identified as a priority.

Louis Verchot, a co-author of the study from the Center for International Forestry Research in Bogor, Indonesia, called for swift efforts to close capacity gaps.

He told SciDev.Net that investment in countries suffering such gaps could yield high returns.

"We laid out the study on a country by country basis, so this should help investors to lay out priorities and help target different types of intervention," Verchot added.

The study provides useful insights on developing a steady emission reduction scheme for REDD+, said Nirarta Samadhi from Indonesia's REDD+ Task Force. He said it highlighted important details about capability gaps that would be valuable to global supporters.

Link to abstract in Environmental Science and Policy

References

Environmental Science and Policy doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.005 (2012)

Comments (2)

pdjmoo ( The Natural Eye Project | United States of America )

6 May 2012

There is no time left to be fooling about with more reports on greenhouse gas relative to forest loss and the REDD+ programs. We all know enough now to demand that we cease and desist from any further deforestation for many reasons, the least of which is climate change, not to mention all the life and ecosystems being devastated that ultimately impact we humans and indigenous peoples. Further deforestation is a no-win for life and the planet. The only win is for profits and we just have to find a biodegradable alternative to timber for consumer needs. The palm oil and agriculture can be addressed without destruction of forests. A better use of our time and money. We can continue to kick the bucket down the road with dates like 2020 or find a way to have a global moratorium on forest destruction NOW...and that will require courage and cooperation from all levels. The matter is urgent. Then you can do all the reports, analysis and studies you want, once the destruction has ceased. A lot of food for thought here and willingness to move beyond our vested interests and old positions for the betterment and good of all life on this planet.

Jorge Laine ( Venezuela )

8 May 2012

Tropical deforestation does not necessarily mean eventual greenhouse gas increment. Scientists must look for land use changes promoting atmospheric carbon capture and storage: for example greening of deserts constituting almost 1/3 of earth nonpermafrost land.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top