Mechanisms for enshrining research ethics must be established, say experts
[BOGOTÁ] A global network of science academies has issued a set of guidelines for responsible research conduct amid a worldwide increase in irresponsible research behavior, and differing views over what constitutes research misconduct and how to deal with it.
"Global standards of behaviour reflecting the universal values of science are not only possible but necessary," says the report, released this week (17 October) by the InterAcademy Panel (IAP).
The report makes several broad policy recommendations for researchers, research institutions, peer-reviewers, and public and private funding agencies, for global implementation.
For example, it recommends that researchers should disclose conflicts of interest and bear in mind any potentially harmful consequences of their work; research institutions should establish effective mechanisms for dealing with misconduct allegations; and funding bodies should require research institutions to have such mechanisms in place.
Donors should also support research institutions in developing education and research programmes on responsible research conduct, it says.
José Lozano, general secretary of the Colombian Academy of Exact, Physical and Natural Sciences, and one of the report's authors, told SciDev.Net that the authors have reviewed the entire research process and have provided recommendations for each stage.
The guidelines were important to write for several key reasons, Barbara Schaal, another of the report's authors, and a vice president of the US National Academy of Sciences, told SciDev.Net.
"First, science is an increasingly international activity. Research groups often have representatives from many cultures and it is important to have a common set of standards, so that science can proceed properly. In addition, there have been some recent high profile cases of science not being conducted responsibly."
The sector has seen enormous growth: between 1995 and 2008, the number of researchers worldwide rose from four million to six million; and between 1996 and 2009, research and development expenditures rose from US$522 billion to US$1.3 trillion.
According to the report, research integrity has become more visible, as the results of research "increasingly underlie and influence public policy debates in many fields, including public health and medicine, climate and the environment, agriculture, and energy".
The ultimate goal of the IAP project is to help the research enterprise develop an ethical framework that applies to every individual and institution involved in research.
"We are in the process of writing up a specific set of guidelines," said Schaal. "We anticipate that each country's science academy will put forth these recommendations and guidelines to those institutions that conduct science."
Chaddah ( India )
23 October 2012
I am a physicist, and our worries about misconduct are dominated more by plagiarism. (Cross-checking reported data for fraud/fabrication is usually easy).While plagiarism of text or results can be tracked using software, plagiarism of ideas cannot be so tracked and is presently a big worry. Plagiarism of an idea, cleverly done by an established byline from a developed country, can really hurt the victim from an emerging byline in a developing country.
Didier Orange ( IRD | France )
1 November 2012
I am an hydrologist and geochemist, working in many parts of the world for international cooperation. I am not fully in agreement with Chaddah. It is sure the plagiarism is not acceptable. But I am not convinced that plagiarism if ideas could be a pb. Maybe we can say the opposite as well. I mean if your idea is used in another team that means your idea has been accepted, so great for you! In addition, I think that maybe the main modern and current problem for science today is the "honesty science". I quote the sentence of Barabara Shaal: "there have been some recent high profile cases of science not being conducted responsibly." It is here the major misconduct of scientific research, too often due to the need of finance, the need of high-level papers, the lack of time. In fact, the cause is simply the rush imposed to the human. There is a solution: the society has to protect the research world to let the time to the researcher to drive their research in a due time.And then to get the time to share their ideas, and suddenly the plagiarism will disappear!
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.