Skip Navigation

Science & Innovation Policy: Science diplomacy

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

USAID steps up its science efforts

Jan Piotrowski

16 November 2012 | EN | ES | FR

USAID gives more power to science, in response to Obama's call

Flickr/The Official White House Photostream

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) has elevated science's level within the organisation, in a bid to push science and technology (S&T) to the forefront of US government development policy.

Creating a direct link between USAID's S&T office and its administrator will help to prioritise S&T within the agency, USAID announced last week.

"This is the continued commitment by USAID to President Obama's call to restore science to its rightful place, and to elevate the role of USAID as a technical agency," Alex Dehgan, S&T advisor to USAID's administrator, tells SciDev.Net.

"We want to push the boundaries of development using S&T and move from mere incremental change to completely changing the way we do things," he says. "We see it as a really big opportunity to put S&T back at the heart of USAID."

With direct access to the administrator, the S&T office will no longer have to work through the agency's hierarchy to push technical issues, explains Dehgan.

USAID also announced last week that it is setting up a Higher Education Solutions Network (HESN), comprising seven leading American and foreign universities and "designed to develop innovative solutions to global development challenges".

The universities, along with 98 worldwide partners, were chosen from about 500 applications submitted from more than 33 countries, for their ability to address one or more of three areas — data access, technology evaluation and innovation incubation — which USAID says are key determinants of successful development.

Each university will set up "development labs" to "solve key problems in areas such as global health, food security and chronic conflict". For example, Makerere University in Uganda — the only university of the seven outside the United States — will lead efforts on improving the resilience of African communities against natural and political stresses.

Meanwhile, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) will begin publishing "consumer reports" to allow policymakers and donors to assess the most effective technology for their needs.

Initial funding of US$26 million could add up to US$130 million over five years, if bipartisan support for the initiative in the US Congress continues, and extra funding will be provided by the lead universities and partners.

HESN adds to a growing number of USAID projects that are building the agency's scientific capacity, says Thomas Kalil, of the White House's Office of Science and Technology Policy.

He notes also that there are now 54 fellows from the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) at the agency — up from just five in 2007.

But outside government circles there is some scepticism.

G. Pascal Zachary, a member of the Science and Policy Outcomes Consortium at Arizona State University, and a technology and development specialist, say USAID policies are "behind the times", and questions the agency's record in science for development.

"With the United States having a hard time managing its own education and infrastructure problems, you wonder what useful expertise it can supply to the rest of the world when it can't satisfy its own needs," he tells SciDev.Net.

Comments (2)

Yves Savidan ( South Africa )

18 November 2012

Another initiative from one country, that doesn't take into consideration what other countries are doing, this leading to more duplications and loss of synergies to tackle the main global challenges.

Nawaz Sharif ( United States of America )

2 February 2013

Even when the duplications are minimized, developing country scientists, researchers and policymakers have to be realistic in terms of expectations regarding development aid from the technologically advanced countries. Here is the obvious rationale. Whether we like it or not, every developing country is now a member of the interdependent globalized economic system. To be a prosperous member of the now dominant science and technology driven knowledge economies of the world, and for sustainable high-skill-jobs creation, every developing country needs to specialize in a few very meticulously selected emerging-technology-centric innovations in goods and services by its own enterprises that can earn “dollars” in the fiercely competitive global marketplace.

Governance of such specialized industrialization, as the key to deal with increased globalization, means each and every country has to become the world’s best in a few globally sought “goods and services” offered by its product-process manufacturing companies in the private sector. And, since “technological innovation is the strategic weapon for international market competition in the current globalized setting,” no one could realistically expect “technological innovation capacity building fund” to be an integral part of “development aid” from their competitors.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top