14/11/11

Egyptian scientist sues Nature

The counsel acting for Nature said that scientists quoted in the article were expressing their honest opinion Copyright: SciDev.Net

We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:

You have to credit our authors.
You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.

For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.

The full article is available here as HTML.

Press Ctrl-C to copy

<div class="article-wrap">
<div id="article-introduction">
<h1>Egyptian scientist sues Nature</h1>
<h4></h4>
</div>
<br />
<br />

<div id="article-body">
<p><span>A libel case between an Egyptian scientist and the scientific journal <em>Nature</em> has begun in the United Kingdom. </span></p>
<p><span>Mohamed El Naschie has brought the case because he says that an article that <em>Nature</em> <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/science-communication/science-publishing/">published</a> in 2008 damaged his reputation. </span></p>
<p><span>The <a href="http://www.scidev.net/en/science-communication/science-journalism/">article</a> said that El Naschie, at that time editor of a theoretical physics journal, self-published papers that had apparently not gone through peer-review — the process of independent checking by other experts in the field that normally precedes publication. </span></p>
<p><span>It also said that he listed some affiliations and honorary professorships with international institutions that could not be confirmed, according to <em>BBC Online</em>. </span></p>
<p><span>When the case opened last week (11 November) the counsel acting for <em>Nature</em> said that scientists quoted in the article were expressing their honest opinion when they said that El Naschie’s papers were of "low quality" and that it was "obvious that there was either zero, or at the very best, very poor-peer review of his own papers". </span></p>
<p><span>The <em>Nature</em> article had also published El Naschie’s defence of his journal’s publication record, saying: "We put more emphasis on the scientific content of the paper and slightly less emphasis on prestigious addresses and impressive affiliations". </span></p>
<p><span>The case continues this week when El Naschie will outline his case. </span></p>
<p><span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15697636?print=true" rel="noopener noreferrer">Link to full article in <em>BBC Online</em></a></span></p>

</div>
<div class="quick-links-wrapper">
<h3>You might also like</h3>
[related-articles]
</div>
<p>This article was originally published on <a href="https://www.scidev.net" target="_blank">SciDev.Net</a>. Read the <a href="https://www.scidev.net/global/news/egyptian-scientist-sues-i-nature-i/" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
(function(e,t,n,r,i,s,o){e["GoogleAnalyticsObject"]=i;e[i]=e[i]||function(){(e[i].q=e[i].q||[]).push(arguments)},e[i].l=1*new Date;s=t.createElement(n),o=t.getElementsByTagName(n)[0];s.async=1;s.src=r;o.parentNode.insertBefore(s,o)})(window,document,"script","//www.google-analytics.com/ga.js","ga");var _gaq=_gaq||[];var _gaq=_gaq||[];_gaq.push(["_setAccount","UA-3223906-8"],["_trackEvent","article interaction","republished","https://www.scidev.net/global/news/egyptian-scientist-sues-i-nature-i/",null,true])
</script>
</div>

A libel case between an Egyptian scientist and the scientific journal Nature has begun in the United Kingdom.

Mohamed El Naschie has brought the case because he says that an article that Nature published in 2008 damaged his reputation.

The article said that El Naschie, at that time editor of a theoretical physics journal, self-published papers that had apparently not gone through peer-review — the process of independent checking by other experts in the field that normally precedes publication.

It also said that he listed some affiliations and honorary professorships with international institutions that could not be confirmed, according to BBC Online.

When the case opened last week (11 November) the counsel acting for Nature said that scientists quoted in the article were expressing their honest opinion when they said that El Naschie’s papers were of "low quality" and that it was "obvious that there was either zero, or at the very best, very poor-peer review of his own papers".

The Nature article had also published El Naschie’s defence of his journal’s publication record, saying: "We put more emphasis on the scientific content of the paper and slightly less emphasis on prestigious addresses and impressive affiliations".

The case continues this week when El Naschie will outline his case.

Link to full article in BBC Online