Skip Navigation

Science & Innovation Policy: Renewable energy

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Maximising Africa's bioenergy potential

Emile Van Zyl

1 September 2010 | EN | FR

Jatropha nursery in Senegal

Current bioenergy efforts in Africa focus on first generation technologies using crops such as jatropha

Flickr/treesftf

African bioenergy projects must focus on new technologies and receive stronger political support, says biofuel expert Emile van Zyl.

Africa has immense potential when it comes to producing energy from biomass, particularly 'second generation' technologies that convert woody or grassy materials — including agricultural waste — into biofuels.

Africa can potentially produce as much plant biomass as any other continent, and far more than it requires for its own food and basic needs. In theory, the continent could replace its transportation fossil fuel demands with renewable biofuel and still be a net exporter of biofuels. Indeed, a 2007 study estimated that by 2050, Africa could provide one quarter of the world's bioenergy through the use of second generation technologies.

If Africa were to join the renewable energy race and realise its potential, it could not only reduce the continent's dependency on oil — bringing foreign exchange savings and much-needed political stability — but also improve food and energy security, support the industrial sector, reduce greenhouse gases and promote land restoration.

It would also help alleviate poverty by improving access to energy in rural areas, boosting local agriculture production, giving farmers access to additional markets and revenues, and generating jobs. The 2007 South African Industrial Biofuels Strategy predicted that the production of just 400 million litres of biofuel per year would generate an additional 25,000 jobs.

Political lethargy

But Africa's current efforts to promote biofuels are ill-informed — projects either focus on food crops or use poorly researched alternatives.

Most African projects concentrate on first generation biofuels produced from crops such as sugarcane or jatropha. While these are undoubtedly essential to establishing a biofuels industry, they suffer inherent limitations, such as demanding large water inputs or limited research.

Second generation biofuels, in contrast, would allow the use of agricultural residues and alien invasive plant species, as well as high-yielding non-food crops that can be grown on more marginal or degraded land.

If a misplaced research focus is hampering African efforts in bioenergy, so too is a lack of political will. 

During the 1980s, both Brazil and South Africa promoted biofuel production. But, while Brazil is now the world's second largest producer of biofuels, Southern Africa's production remains pitifully small, standing at less than 5 per cent of the 20 billion litres predicted to come out of Brazil this year.

Why this staggering difference? Very early on, the Brazilian government gave significant subsidies and tax breaks to farmers, distillers and car manufacturers in its ProAlcool Programme. And by financing a distribution network to get biofuel to gas stations, and keeping alcohol prices low, it encouraged uptake by consumers.

In contrast, it wasn't until 2007 that South Africa produced its eagerly awaited Biofuels Industry Strategy — and then the low targets and limited incentives stifled the industry. If African leaders could exert the same political will as Brazil did in the early 1980s, just think where the continent would be now. 

The sky's the limit

For bioenergy to become a reality for Africa, we Africans must take charge of our own future.

This means revitalising agriculture and rural development, starting with policies and frameworks to encourage local collaboration between African nations. The dumping of excess subsidised food on local markets must be prevented so that rural farmers can produce crops at competitive prices.

It also means adopting an entrepreneurial attitude — securing land tenure and taking ownership in African bioenergy programmes.

Equally important is developing our human resource capacity in sustainable agriculture and forestry research through training and rekindling our love for these sectors.

We need to approach donors and development banks with sound business plans, and negotiate access to technology and adapt it to African conditions. A South African biofuels company, StellenboschBiomass Technologies has, for example, acquired the rights to adapt and commercialise cellulosic ethanol technology from the US-based biofuels company Mascoma Corporation.

This will allow them to adapt the technology for southern African conditions and plant materials, and to produce biofuel from non-edible parts of plants. But to make a real impact, this type of effort will need to be implemented at a much broader scale.

If we can achieve this, the sky will be the limit for Africa in the renewable era.

Emile Van Zyl is a professor of microbiology and holds a research chair in biofuels research at Stellenbosch University, South Africa.

Comments (8)

Angela Cordeiro ( Brazil )

6 September 2010

It is important to consider that Biofuel production could take place of food crops. Even in Brazil that has lot of land, biofuel production is already displacing food crops. Policy makers should keep it in mind. Most African countries still face a huge challenge to achieve food and nutritional security. It is very sad knowing that African countries are feeding cars elsewhere while its people are starving.

Peter ( United Kingdom )

6 September 2010

We welcome the statement by Professor Emile Van Zyl about Biofuels production in Africa. As a Company that has made it very clear that this was always the case - We in Genesyst UK - concur entirely with the statements. Making Biofuels for transport from Biomass (from Non-Food sources) in particular from waste derived from Municipal Industrial and Agricultural sources is the only path to follow and we concur with the findings that from these alone Africa would be self-sufficient in Transport Fuels and have a healthy Export. Further still because we can now also grow macro-algae in farms and capture/sequest carbon dioxide to help this grow in abundance we can also grow this in areas of Brackish Water as well as in salt water areas and in deserts. Making these Fuels like this can be done competitively and if we can also maximise capture the GHGs. This potential must not be ignored for it would have a major effect on economies reducing the import of oil as well as provide employment.

peter zuurbier ( Netherlands )

6 September 2010

Emile you are right; diversifying the energy matrix requires a pro-active government policy; that is what we learn here in Brazil. Considering, of course, the specific energy resources, the feedstock potential, the infrastructural demands and public and private entrepreneurship to make it all happen. We should develop a benchmark for energy policy development, to overcome fragmented and not sustainable policies.

cloustonenergy ( United States of America )

7 September 2010

The Food Security Group and I have sent a video to the FAO about people who gained weight, doubled their income by growing Food Crop with Solar Drip Irrigation that conserves water. Those who do not grow food must go hungry if they do not find a cash crop such as biomass for bioenergy and biofuel. People without any money cannot buy food. With efficient use of water biocrops can be made and sold for an income.

Steven Dovey ( ICFR | South Africa )

7 September 2010

We need to consider what we are sacrificing on our land and what we are gaining with renewable energy production. We should take care not to place increased pressure on our land and ecosystem resources in an unsustainable manner.The removal of agricultural wastes for example, has the potential to negatively impact on the soil fertility, carbon stocks, soil acidity and soil structure. Such an incentive will need careful planning and a collaborative approach that integrates social, environmental and economic factors so that the gains we make now are not at the expense of future generations.

Eugene Viljoen ( South Africa )

8 September 2010

Emile, you have one major Problem,we have no water in South Africa to accomodate such developments,and what we have is contaminated. Please advise the volume of water required to produce 1(one) liter of biofuel not the pumping and supply costs but at a true value in terms of source refer to WRC research.

Peter Baker ( United Kingdom )

8 September 2010

I agree with previous two comments. You can't displace food crops, and you surely shouldn't destroy more non-agricultural land because of ecosystem service requirements. So that leaves marginal, abandoned, unused agricultural land. Has anyone evaluated exactly how much of this land is available and exploitable and shown that biofuels can be grown there, without irrigation? Long-term projections for rainfall in S Africa are truly frightening. Or do you have a plan for converting virgin land near a river or something like that? Biofuels always sound good until you get down to specifics, then it mostly starts to look ugly.

Barney Muckle ( Kenya )

8 September 2010

Emile from Kenya, I have been trying to calculate the area needed to provide the equivalent of one hour's pumping from the Mombasa to Nairobi pipeline which is 105 tonnes. 80% of the country is semi arid and the remainder heavily populated. Barney Muckle

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top