Skip Navigation

Science & Innovation Policy

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Virus-resistant cassava could be available by 2015

Lucas Laursen

9 July 2010 | EN

Cassava — a staple crop in Africa — is vulnerable to many diseases

Flickr/CIAT/Neil Palmer

Cassava breeds that are resistant to two major viruses could soon be available to farmers in Africa.

Cassava mosaic disease and brown streak disease stunt the growth and rot the roots of crops, respectively.

Mosaic disease alone destroys an estimated 35 million tonnes of African cassava a year — the difference between needing to import food into Africa and achieving food independence, according to researchers at the US-based Donald Danforth Plant Science Center.

The team has shown in the laboratory tests that genetically engineered (GE) tobacco plants resist brown streak disease. Their results will appear in Molecular Plant Pathology next month (August), Claude Fauquet, lead author of the study and director of cassava research at the centre, told SciDev.Net.

Pending field trials will test the same modification in various cassava breeds selected according to farmers' tastes and local growing conditions in Kenya and Uganda, he said.

The team is also awaiting approval to run field tests on resistance to brown streak disease with collaborators in Kenya, Nigeria and Uganda.

But it could be 2015 before the plants are approved for commercial use, said Fauquet, whose team is building local laboratories and facilities, and training African scientists and technicians to handle the field trials.

Researchers in Kenya and Tanzania are also expecting approval for field trials of cassava breeds resistant to mosaic disease, Morag Ferguson, a plant molecular geneticist at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Kenya, told SciDev.Net. The team used a non-GE approach by cross-breeding native and wild strains of cassava to achieve resistance in laboratory and greenhouse tests.

Both teams hope for swift approval by the continent's nascent biosafety regulation community, even though many African countries still lack clear biosafety laws.

Ferguson said that successful field trials of disease-resistant cassava could "prompt countries to get their biosafety regulations in place".

Legislators are cautious of GE technology at first but if there is a chance of successfully controlling crop disease they would like to see those solutions applied quickly, Fauquet said.

But Anne Kingiri, a research fellow at the UK Department for International Development's Research into Use Programme, said that the deployment of GE plants is not dependent only on biosafety regulations, nor are the regulations only dependent on the technology — country-specific social and institutional factors also play a role.

"Quicker passage of biosafety laws — which are pertinent for GE technology deployment — will depend on many factors, including honesty and transparency amongst researchers about benefits and potential risks," she said.

Comments (3)

ironjustice ( Canada )

10 July 2010

One might wonder why one would NEED these 'messed with' plants WHEN the latest study has shown cassava has OVERTAKEN maize as a staple crop .. ? The improvements ALREADY made are SUCCESSFULLY improving the food supply and NOW 'someone' comes along with plants which some might say are SIMILAR TO the plants in China that have COLLAPSED their food supply due to the new disease in the cotton .. ? "Scientists call for GM review after surge in pests around cotton farms in China Farmland struck by infestations of bugs following widespread adoption of Bt cotton made by biotech giant Monsanto"

Nagib Nassar,Universidade Brasilia,Brasil ( Brazil )

13 July 2010

I agree with Anne Kingiri saying ¨Quicker passage of biosafety laws which are pertinent for GE technology deployment will depend on honesty and transparency amongst researchers about benefits and potential risks," I would like to add If there is a chance of successfully controlling crop disease, a robust mean is to guarantee biosafety and high productivity.English scientists Storrey and Nichols work in the dcade 1930s, transferred gene of resistance to mosaic from wild species M. glaziovii and saved East Africa .


In the decade 1980´s , IITA breeder, S.K.Hahn , using material supplied by University of Brasilia developed resistant varieties planted now in more than four millions hectars at Nigeria. This Brazilian material costed , few thousand dollars supplied by both Canadian IDRC and Brazilian CNPq.


I wander if the gene of resistance exists in the wild and can be transferred by simple hybridization why we risk people biosafety and waste millions of dollars in such adventure. References Nassar, N. M. A. ; Ortiz, R . Scientific American, v. 302, p. 78-84, 2010. Nichols, R.F. W. 1947. East. Afr. Agr. J. 12: 184-194.

ironjustice ( Canada )

14 July 2010

Quote: why we risk people biosafety and waste millions of dollars in such adventure Answer: A story just out states the cost to DELIVER the food to impoverished places is twice the amount of the food. Cost is $2 for every $1 worth of food. THAT is the 'reason' WHY. Those who are in CONTROL use the monies supplied to THEIR best interest as opposed to yours or mine. In that case one could make the argument that somehow the people who deliver make more money.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top