Government support is crucial to successful research partnerships between developed and developing countries
An OECD report outlines good practice for effective international research collaboration — but success can never be guaranteed.
One of the most promising aspects of the development scene in recent years has been the growing willingness of researchers, spurred by agencies such as the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, to collaborate across international boundaries to develop potential solutions to important scientific and social problems.
Initially, most of this international collaboration was between scientists in the developed world — who tend to have greater financial and technical resources — and those in developing countries who were often cast in the role of junior partners, allocated tasks such as data gathering or number crunching.
More recently, these partnerships have become more equal as scientists in developed countries have seen how local context affects their work, and developing countries have built up their own research capabilities. South–South research collaborations have also grown as developing countries have sought to strengthen their science base.
Last month, Mexico and Honduras announced an agreement on scientific exchanges — the latest in a rapidly growing list of collaborations that are producing scientific, social and even political benefits, helping to cement trade links, for example.
But there is still a long way to go until all such collaborations work smoothly and productively. Recent years have seen plans to boost research and development in the Islamic world fail to come to fruition. And in Africa, plans for a flagship network for postgraduate science training were held back last year by political infighting.
Too often, misunderstandings, unrealistic expectations, mismatched capabilities and excessive bureaucracy undermine steps to create effective partnerships. These obstacles can lead to frustration, wasted resources and missed opportunities.
In a bid to increase the prospects for successful scientific collaboration, the Global Science Forum of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) last month published a report on opportunities, challenges and good practices in international research cooperation between developed and developing countries.
Based on the conclusions of a project initiated by the Japanese government in 2008 and culminating in a workshop held in South Africa last September, the report provides a valuable overview of good practice and provides concrete suggestions for improving collaboration.
The report distils a wide set of practical experiences (both successes and failures). It is based on broad consultation with scientific and development agencies, although admittedly most were based in developed countries.
Much of what the report outlines will be familiar to those already engaged in collaborative activity. For example, it sets out the criteria that should be used to select potential partners, and how potential collaborators must weigh up their goals.
Equally important is the contribution that collaborations can make to building research capacity. This is often the most important long-term impact of collaborative programmes sponsored by development agencies.
The report emphasises the need to achieve "an optimal balance between the imperatives of research (bottom-up initiatives, peer review, etc.) with top-down strategic development priorities".
And it points out that any potential collaboration needs to pay attention from the beginning both to the way that its results will be evaluated — whether in scientific or in social terms — and how they will be communicated to both policymakers and the general public.
But some of the proposals are less obvious — and just as important. For example, the report highlights the importance of a supporting policy environment for research collaboration, stressing the role governments can play in providing the type of backing that can cut through red tape and minimise bureaucracy.
At the same time, it warns of the dangers of relying on political backing, particularly in unstable situations where such patronage can disappear overnight with a change in government.
On a more positive note, participants at the South African workshop concluded that, in general, concerns about "asymmetry" in research collaborations between partners from developed and developing countries no longer reflect what happens in practice, as was highlighted some years ago in a report by the Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships with Developing Countries (KFPE).
"Rather, these collaborations bring together partners with distinct and complementary strengths," says the Global Science Forum report. "This finding challenges all stakeholders to develop ways of identifying the contributions in documents, reports, and evaluations of programmes and projects."
There is no simple formula to ensure success in research collaboration. What works in one situation — for example, a partnership between institutions with no government support from either side — may not work in another, where external support is essential.
Even political support can be a mixed blessing. Where it is based on genuine scientific opportunity, it can help in achieving success. But where political pressures lead to reluctant partners being shoehorned together without adequate resources, failure is inevitable.
The OECD report provides a valuable checklist of factors for researchers and administrators to consider before embarking on a collaborative project.
Success can never be guaranteed. Each project will have its own internal tensions and external pressures. But one thing is certain: the more such collaborative projects succeed, the greater will be the overall contribution of science to development.
Prince Pieray Awele Odor ( Pieray Awele @ Associates | Nigeria )
17 May 2011
"Initially, most of this international collaboration was between scientists in the developed world — who tend to have greater financial and technical resources — and those in developing countries who were often cast in the role of junior partners, allocated tasks such as data gathering or number crunching.
More recently, these partnerships have become more equal as scientists in developed countries have seen how local context affects their work, and developing countries have built up their own research capabilities. South–South research collaborations have also grown as developing countries have sought to strengthen their science base".
The last part is not true while the first part remains the case. There is NO "collaboration". There is still master-servant relation. There is reductionism by which your best for Africans and whatever is American MUST be global!
Whose idea is any collaboration work? Who finances collaborations? Take note that "he who pays the piper dictates the tune". Who evaluates collaborations? Who decides how and where the product of collaborations will be applied? Who earns most from their products? Who suffers most due to their products?
Your strategies are very well known to those of us who unfortunately are not leaders or influential. But one day, there will be a change.
LEAVE AFRICANS ALONE!
Prince Awele Odor
Syed ( The Daily Star (the most circulated English Daily of Bangladesh)) | Bangladesh )
17 May 2011
Since the North, or more specifically, the West has reached the zenith of scientific advancement and is still moving ahead at a breakneck pace, the knowledge divide between it and the less developed countries in the South is widening at a faster rate.
The question of transfer of scientific knowledge from the First world to the less privileged nations of Asia, Africa and the Latin America is still a pertinent issue.
So, the need for more cooperation and collaborative ventures between the two cannot be just wished away. However, such transfer is subject to a big change in the West's mindset. In fact, the West's outlook towards the poorer Southern nations has remained as it was before- a relationship between patron and client. This is the problem. The West needs to understand that at some point of time such a situation would contribute to widening the the economic and as such the political gap, too. The West would allow that to happen only to their own peril.
The faster is the gap reduced the better it is for both the sides. And neither side can ignore this basic fact.
Syed Fattahul Alim
Nawaz Sharif ( United States of America )
25 May 2011
The gap cannot be reduced by esternal resources. It can only be reduced by the local activities. The sooner we recognize this the better!
"Technological Innovation for Winning the Future" is inevitable. But, in my opinion, a country needs to do at least four things to make it happen efficiently: (1) adopt an actionable definition of technological systems utilized in all kinds of work-packages; (2) undertake public-private-partnerships for targeted specialization in emerging technology industries; (3) complement university-linked incubators with metropolis-based innovation hotspots; and (4) put into use a balanced choice criteria function for technological innovation capacity building decisions. My essay describes these four imperatives for developing countries based on my experience in and analysis of Asian countries.
If you are interested to receive a copy of my essay just send an email to me at email@example.com
You may be interested to visit my blog on technological innovation:
Dr.A.Jagadeesh ( Nayudamma Centre for Development Alternatives | India )
31 July 2011
Yes. International research collaborations will certainly pay rich dividends. Developing countries will benefit much through collaboration with advanced countries.
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.