Skip Navigation

Policy Briefs

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Anticipating the drawbacks of biofuels

Source: IWMI

16 January 2009 | EN

Producing biofuels from crops such as sugar cane could also impact food supplies and prices

Flickr/littlewoodenman

This policy brief, published by the International Water Management Institute (IWMI), examines the likely adverse impacts of growing biofuels and outlines options for reducing these.

Rising oil prices, coupled with concerns over energy security and climate change, have stimulated interest in biofuels across the developing world.

But such crops need a lot of water — 2,400 litres for maize to yield one litre of ethanol in China for example. And growing biofuels in water-scarce areas will aggravate the already fierce competition between domestic users, industry, agriculture and the environment, say the authors.

Producing biofuels from crops such as wheat, maize or sugar cane could also impact food supplies and prices. And switching from industrial crops, such as cotton, could affect livelihoods.

Biofuel crops could also add to conflicts between environmental and livelihood goals in the water sector, say the authors. For example, in India, irrigated sugar cane for biofuel is putting pressure on the Krishna Basin, where water flow requirements are seldom met because more and more water is being withdrawn.

Policymakers, say the authors, must make sensible tradeoffs between biofuels and other water uses. They should focus on less thirsty crops such as jatropha or sweet sorghum, that are less likely to compete with food crops.

Supporting new technologies is also important. New ways of making ethanol, for example from waste straw using enzymes, might become cost-effective in the next decade and will typically require less water than traditional biofuel crops.

Comments (1)

AS Jeng ( Bioforsk | Norway )

8 February 2010

For Africa South of the Sahara, biofuel production based on gramineae and cereals is a non-starter. The water requirement for these crops are much more than can be met by any SSA country in these time of climate change. The potential in jatropha and, possibly moringa, should be exploited. These can be used, in addition to fuel production, to rehabilitate marginal lands, by ploughing back their by-products (presscake after oil extraction) to improve physical and chemical soil properties. Policymakers should take this into account. Policy should also discourage the purchase and cultivation of huge areas of rich land for jatropha instead of food production.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Policy Briefs
To the top

Information Services