Skip Navigation

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Snubbing of local journals skews research

Source: New Scientist

21 July 2008 | EN | 中文

The pressure to publish in high-impact journals is harming local journals growth

SciDev.Net

Researchers' preference for publishing in globally recognised journals is skewing the direction of scientific inquiry away from local research, writes Priya Shetty in New Scientist.

In areas such as healthcare, agriculture and the environment it leads them to prioritise global research that may not meet the needs of individual countries.

The problem stems from the vicious circle in which local developing country journals find themselves trapped: because researchers see little value in publishing in them, they lack the high-quality papers required to attract authors.

One solution is for universities to give additional recognition to researchers who choose to publish their research locally. Additionally, donors should invest in local journals to compensate the lack of revenue from subscriptions.

Shetty says that online publishing is the way forward, citing the development of the open-access movement in the North as an example of how this can be achieved.

Developing countries are beginning to take ownership of the research they undertake. Now they must start to take control of where that research is published," she says.


Link to full article in New Scientist

Comments (1)

Research Cooperative ( The Research Cooperative | Japan )

7 September 2008

In Japan, huge amounts of money have been spent on creating and publishing in house university- and institute-specific journals and books, with little attention to distribution, visibility, and accessibility - even within Japan. Without attention to the full chain of production and distribution, from author to editors, publishing, reviewers and eventual readers (now and in the future) the benefits of local publishing can easily be lost, and the funds may be used very inefficiently. Effective science communication depends on the existence of research communities with a critical mass of experience and talent; for some countries this may require operating at a regional or national level rather than at the level of a single institution, or a single city

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top

Information Services