Skip Navigation

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Global inaction on bird flu is 'scandalous'

Source: Nature

13 January 2005 | EN | 中文

Going to market to sell ducks in Laos

Going to market to sell ducks in Laos

IRD / Bernard Moizo

The bird flu virus that killed 34 people in South-East Asia last year is not easily transmitted from person to person. But if it were to exchange genes with a mammalian flu virus, we could witness a global flu pandemic, which would threaten the lives of tens of millions of people.

Yet, argues an editorial in this week's Nature, governments continue to ignore the threat. Surveillance in Asia is insufficient to monitor the progress of the virus. Moreover, governments around the world are unprepared to handle a viral pandemic of any kind.

Rich governments are not inclined to help poor countries monitor animal viruses because they see it as a form of economic assistance. In this, they ignore the global threat posed by these viruses.

Furthermore, few rich countries have stockpiled flu drugs or made any effort to increase the infrastructure to enable them to produce the volume of drugs and vaccine doses that will be needed should a pandemic occur.

The World Health Organization has stated that the world is not prepared for the next pandemic, whatever its scale. Nature calls the state of global inaction on this issue "scandalous".

Link to full article in Nature

Reference: Nature 433, 91 (2005)

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top