Skip Navigation

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Mexican trial of GM maize stirs debate

Cecilia Rosen

18 April 2011 | EN | ES

Maize

Mexico is home to thousands of maize varieties

Flickr/CIMMYT

[MEXICO CITY] Mexico has authorised a field trial of genetically modified (GM) maize that could lead to commercialisation of the crop, sparking debate about the effects on the country's unique maize biodiversity.

Although Mexico already commercially grows some GM crops, such as cotton, GM maize is controversial because the country is home to thousands of the world's maize varieties that originated there.

The multinational corporation Monsanto will test a variety of maize resistant to the herbicide glyphosate on less than a hectare of land in north Mexico before it can commercialise the GM crop. Unlike experimental trials, such pilot projects do not require containment measures to prevent the spread of the GM crop.

Mexico's agriculture ministry said the project, approved last month (8 March), will occur "under the strictest biosecurity measures to guarantee the prevention of involuntary dispersion of the GM maize's pollen".

But Elena Álvarez-Buylla, head of the Union of Scientists Committed to Society (UCCS), said: "This opens up the door to contamination of native species in the most important centre of origin [of maize] in the entire world."

The UCCS stated last month (25 March) that the coexistence of GM and non-GM varieties in fields — which may happen if commercial approval is given — could contaminate the unique non-GM varieties.

"There are alternative technologies to address the non-GM maize shortage and loss of crops due to climate events. GM [crops] are not more resistant to droughts and plagues, and they threaten our food sovereignty," its statement says, referring to multinational companies owning GM technologies.

Transgenic crops were banned in Mexico until 2005, but the government has since granted 67 permits for GM maize to be grown experimentally on over 70 hectares. This would be the first trial that could lead to commercialisation if it is successful.

At the third Mexican Congress of Ecology this month (3–7 April) in Veracruz, scientists were cautious about growing GM maize.

Andrew Stephenson, an ecology professor at Pennsylvania University, United States, said the indirect effects of mixing GM and non-GM varieties are largely unknown, especially under Mexico's complex environmental conditions.

And Mauricio Quesada of the National Autonomous University's Centre for Ecosystems Research said Mexico should prioritise research on the natural diversity of local crops instead of "jumping" into GM.

But Luis Herrera-Estrella, chief of the National Laboratory of Genomics for Biodiversity at the Research and Advanced Studies Center of the National Polytechnic Institute of Mexico, said the country's legal biosafety framework should be trusted.

Comments (4)

noblesensei ( United States of America )

20 April 2011

Studies show that the corn in Latin America is already contaminated with GMO corn strains; that's why I don't eat corn. Sad, but pray for the those down south consuming this GMO poison.

Kris Johnson ( United States of America )

20 April 2011

Don't the authorities in Mexico realize the damage that may ensue, some of which is detailed here http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/AboutGeneticallyModifiedFoods/index.cfm. Monsanto must be twisting arms again. How do we fight against such monsters?

Kev_C ( United Kingdom )

20 April 2011

What should be of greater concern to all is the fact that Monsanto will lay claim to all varieties of indigenous Maize in Mexico by virtue of the contamination process (which they are counting on) transferring their patent gene to the indigenous Maize. Try proving it is a naturally occurring Mexican Maize variety in the face of the Monsanto legal machine that, so far, has never lost a case yet. They are about to steal the Maize varieties of Mexico and claim them for their own. Just watch and see if they don't. I defy the people of Mexico to try stopping them.

ellabaker ( Mongolia )

26 April 2011

The official U.S. position on genetically-modified organisms is that there is no difference between them and natural organisms. The issue goes even further to suggest that no country should be able to require mandatory GMO labeling on food items, even though science shows that GMOs act differently in the body than do natural organisms and are a threat to health. You can take action by staying informed and spreading the word at http://geneticallyengineeredfoodnews.com

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top