Skip Navigation

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Malaria goals 'cannot be met' with existing weapons

Priya Shetty

12 August 2010 | EN | FR | 中文

African child sleeps under bednet

Bednets are not enough

Flickr\Vestergaard_Frandsen

Eliminating malaria, especially from its hotspots in Africa, will be impossible without new types of intervention, a newly published model has confirmed.

To eliminate malaria in Africa, current interventions would need to reach far more people than health and transport infrastructures permit, according to Prof Azra Ghani,  an infectious disease epidemiologist, and colleagues at Imperial College, London.

The team modelled how current and future anti-malaria interventions might affect the mosquito that carries the most dangerous malaria parasite, Plasmodium falciparum. Today's tools include insecticide-treated bednets, indoor spraying with insecticides and the latest drug (artemisinin). Future tools include vaccination.

The model revealed that, in areas with low to moderate malaria transmission, increasing interventions so they cover 80 per cent of the people — which is considered an achievable target — could cut infection with the parasite to one per cent of the human population — a level considered to be sufficiently low that control methods can keep the disease from spreading.

But their model also clearly showed that in areas of high malaria transmission, reducing infection to a similar level would require unfeasibly widespread interventions, especially given the poor infrastructure.

There is renewed enthusiasm to rid the world of malaria, rather than just control the disease. In 2008 the WHO launched the Global Malaria Action Plan, which has led to initiatives such as the Malaria Eradication Research Agenda (malERA).

And on World Malaria Day this year (24 April), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention promised to try to eliminate the disease by making malaria interventions universally available. Meanwhile funding for malaria nearly doubled to US$1.7 billion between 2006 and 2009.

"Our model can help planners evaluate the likely impact of combining interventions," said Ghani whose work is published in the August edition of PLoS Medicine. "It can help them to prioritise where resources are limited."

The new results confirm previous malaria models, said Dave Smith, biologist at the Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, United States.

The added value of the new model, he said, is in simulating malaria transmission between individuals in settings across the continent, thus being simultaneously detailed and far-reaching: "which is not an easy thing to do".

Geoff Targett, of the UK-based London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, told SciDev.Net that the model was particularly valuable because it managed to include the variability in transmission across the continent.

Creating effective vaccines, said Targett, especially those that block transmission of the parasite rather than preventing disease after infection, "is likely to be the one major development that will ensure that control, and particularly elimination, become feasible across Africa".

Link to full article in PLoS

Comments (1)

Elhassan Elhassan ( University of Gezira. Faculty of Medicine | Sudan )

23 September 2010

This article is obviously a realistic approach in malaria goals. It contains the most objective address to the universal issue of malaria, because of the realism among its folds which makes the conclusion: that our efforts in malaria control/eradication are still not genuine. If we adopt these conclusions of Ghani, the target is now very clear. Universal transparency is really needed.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top

Information Services