Skip Navigation

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Controversy over sacked Venezuelan scientist

Marielba Núñez

20 May 2009 | EN | ES | 中文

Jaime Requena

ASOVAC

[CARACAS] The dismissal of a Venezuelan scientist has reignited controversy over academic freedom among scientists in the country.

Jaime Requena, a biologist and professor at the Foundation Institute of Advanced Studies of Venezuela (IDEA), was dismissed last month (April 13) in a letter signed by Prudencio Chacón, the institute's director. Requena has had a 40-year career in science, including the directorship of IDEA in the 1980s.

Requena says his work and his opposition to the government of president Hugo Chávez are the reasons for his dismissal.

In a recent project he measured Venezuelan researchers' productivity by analysing their publication rates in national and international journals. His preliminary results indicated that scientific productivity is at its lowest in 25 years.

Requena also wrote a letter published in Nature in January 2008 denouncing falling public financing for Venezuelan scientific projects, particularly in the social sciences, for which he says he was disciplined by Prudencio Chacón.

After the dismissal, IDEA issued a public letter (24 April) saying Requena had breached the terms of his contract by simultaneously working for another institution, the Metropolitan University (Fundamet). IDEA also said Requena had a conflict of interest when he recommended that IDEA buy software developed by Fundamet.

Requena rejects this, saying he resigned from Fundamet the moment he resumed working for IDEA in 2007. He argues the software he recommended is essential to his work.

Requena has written to Jesse Chacón, the Minister of Science and Technology, to argue his case but says he has received no reply. He now plans to take his case to the courts.

"Up to the moment no legal action has been taken because my attorneys are studying the options that we have," he told SciDev.Net.

This is the second time Requena has been dismissed from IDEA. He told SciDev.Net he believes that his first dismissal, in 1995, was for opposing a takeover of IDEA by the Simón Bolívar University. After a legal battle lasting 12 years he was reinstated in 2007.

Luis Carbonell, president of the Commission of Human Rights at the Venezuelan Association for the Advancement of Science (ASOVAC), told SciDev.Net that he believes the episode demonstrates Venezuelan scientists' lack of independence.

"There is an official disdain towards critical thinking. Science centres are even banning researchers from expressing public opinions or making statements to the media without the official consent," he says. He gives other examples, such as universities restricting Internet access.

This is the second time ASOVAC has questioned a public institution's dismissal of a scientist. Two years ago the physicist Claudio Mendoza was sacked as chief of the laboratory of physics computing at the Venezuelan Institute of Scientific Research (IVIC) after writing an article in El Nacional newspaper deriding government plans to acquire nuclear technology (see Venezuelan scientist demoted for nuclear wisecrack).

In 2003, 881 workers, mostly technical and scientific researchers, were dismissed from INTEVEP, the state-owned research centre for the petroleum industry, for joining a strike against Hugo Chávez's government.

And in 2005, IVIC's Maria Nieves García published research about high anaemia rates in two-year-old children attending health clinics in three Venezuelan states. The Department of Science published a letter in newspapers questioning the research's importance and hinting its publication was motivated by an anti-government agenda.

Comments (3)

Prudencio Chacón ( IDEA | Venezuela )

22 May 2009

Dr. Requena Dismissal is Adapted and Based on the Law In view of the campaign of discredit and falsehoods against the Fundación Instituto de Estudios Avanzados IDEA unleashed by the opposition following the dismissal of Dr. Jaime Requena, it is convenient to make the national and international public opinion aware of the reality of the events. Firstly, Requena dismissal is due to three reasons, any of them enough to adopt the decision taken: (a) He worked in two places simultaneously, at IDEA (as a professor) and at the Universidad Metropolitana Foundation (UNIMET) as General Manager and Secretary of minutes. (b) He left his work several times without permission from his supervisor. (c) Lack of probity or immoral conduct at work, expressed in its official request to purchase through IDEA of a software developed by him at the UNIMET Foundation. Another element claimed by the media opinion matrix in his defense is that any administrative file was not opened before its dismissal. In this regard, it is clarified that the rights of workers in IDEA, since it is a Foundation, are governed by the Organic Labor Law. Accordingly, the legal procedure for taking the dismissal decision – since Dr. Requena is not a public servant – does not contemplate a previous administrative file opening. This does not preclude in any way the possibility of exercising his right to defense, guaranteed by democratic institutions of the Venezuelan State. Raised the real reasons why Dr. Requena was dismissed, it is worth highlighting that the causes of this measure are far from being political, as the researcher intended it to appear. At IDEA, as stipulated in the Constitution of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, political thought is free. In this sense, the dismissal in question is framed by the strictest compliance with the law. Finally, the IDEA Foundation emphatically rejects the manipulation, both national and international, that has been intended from this case. This manipulation lies in transforming serious misconducts at work, on ethical and legal levels, into political flags of the Venezuelan opposition. Prudencio Chacón President of IDEA

Miguel Laufer ( Venezuela )

26 May 2009

Mr. Chacon states that “Requena dismissal is due to three reasons, any of them enough to adopt the decision taken”. All three reasons given, according to any modern and reasonable legal system, would require some form of certification and pre-dismissal pre-notification. The alleged fact that Requena is not a public servant and can thus be dismissed by his boss without further procedures, if true, is offensive, a slap on the face of any person who has devoted his life or a good part of it to scientific research. I do not wish to comment on the effective guarantees existing for the right to defense, the freedom of political thought, nor the causes of the measure being far from political. Any keen observer of Venezuelan politics can form a clear opinion on these regards.

Jaime Requena ( Venezuela )

1 June 2009

The President of IDEA explained through this media the reasons for my dismissal after 27 years as an employee and a total of 41 years serving Venezuelan science but I was never informed of any alleged wrongdoing on my part while at IDEA. As the most senior professor at IDEA until my dismissal, I would like to defend myself, a right that has been denied to me in my country.
The accusation that while at IDEA from I worked as employee of another academic institution is false. This is proven by my letter of resignation, dated January 3rd, 2007, the day I rejoined IDEA ( http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/2564123_vtm2g/RenunciaFundamet2007enero.pdf ). Regarding the purchase of a piece of software in which he argued that I had a vested economic interest, the truth is that before rejoining IDEA I was part of a team that develop software for bibliometric use. These programs are not my property and I am not entitled to receive any money for their sale as stated by its owners. ( http://www.hotlinkfiles.com/files/2567098_p40tx/ConstanciaBiblios.doc ). Being researching on bibliometric at IDEA, it seemed reasonable to request the purchase of BIBLIOS for use by the students of my research Unit in order to avoid software piracy. The software was never acquired.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top