Skip Navigation

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

'Cardboard cooker' wins climate prize

Source: Financial Times

14 April 2009 | EN | 中文

A similar solar cooker. Both use reflective properties to harness the sun's rays

Flickr/ rogoyski

A new solar-powered cooker fashioned from cardboard boxes has won a prize that will fund its manufacture for use across the developing world.

The "Kyoto Box" consists of two cardboard boxes — one inside the other — with an acrylic lid that traps heat from the sun, acting as a hob. Black paint, foil and insulation work together to raise the temperature to the boiling point of water. The cooker was chosen as the winner of the Financial Times Climate Change Challenge by a panel of judges and members of the public.

Jon Bøhmer, the cooker's inventor, says that the secret to the Kyoto Box's success lies in its simplicity. "There are too few people looking at simple research. We need the basic stuff too."

Bøhmer has been awarded US$75,000 to develop the cookers, which costs just US$5 to make, can be manufactured in existing cardboard factories and will be given away for free.

A more robust corrugated plastic version has been developed that costs the same and is ready to be tested in ten countries.

Both versions could save up to two tonnes of carbon emissions per family per year, and Bøhmer is hoping that the Kyoto Box will be eligible for carbon credits — hence its name.

Link to full article in the Financial Times

Comments (1)

Scott Justice ( Nepal )

20 April 2009

This is interesting as it is inexpensive and simple. But problems abound with acceptance and spread of solar cookers. There have been perhaps thousands of national and international projects that have experimented, developed and promoted different models of solar cookers/ovens. The only project where cookers spread widely- measured in the tens of thousands, was a government sponsored / subsidized project for parabolic cookers in China. But the fate/continued use of those are in doubt. That's not to say developers should not keep trying, but their donors should understand well the limitations and disadvantages that have limited the spread of past attempts.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top

Information Services