
Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
Research institutes must beef up their security procedures to guard against anti-technology attacks
Flickr/uckhet
The claims of an anti-technology group that has recently claimed responsibility for parcel bomb attacks on Mexican researchers are "absurd", but the threat they pose must be taken seriously, says physicist Gerardo Herrera Corral, whose brother was targeted in the attacks.
The extremist group has declared that nanotechnology will lead to humanity's downfall, and blamed scientists who work on it for "seeking to advance control over people by 'the system'". It has been linked to other attacks in Chile, France and Spain.
Herrera Corral urges the police to take these incidents seriously, and the scientific community to be alert to terrorist organisations and their capabilities to cause destruction and spread fear. "Nanotechnology-research institutes and departments, companies and professional associations must beef up their security procedures, particularly on how they receive and accept parcels and letters."
He argues that opposing technology and technical development is acceptable, and the value of pursuing further advances should be openly debated. "Yet radical groups ... overlook a crucial detail: it is not technology that is the problem, but how we use it."
Dynamite, for example, has found applications in mining, construction and other industries — but it can also be used to make a parcel bomb, says Herrera Corral.
Nature 476, 373 (2011)
KAL ( United States of America )
6 September 2011
When any group moves beyond threats it should be taken very seriously, however anyone can make a threat, but do they have the capacity to carry it out and have they? In general however, journalists need to be careful not to sensationalize the very rare or blow it out proportion or take it out of context. Politicians receive death threats much more often - how might the situations compare? And even if deters deters one or two scientists how many others in the field are not threatened or deterred from doing research. One or two in hundreds or thousands are serious, but not necessarily a trend.
Death threats should not be taken lightly, but balance is key.
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.
29 May 2012