Skip Navigation

Latin America & Caribbean

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Rising emissions may double sweet potato size

Zoraida Portillo

26 December 2012 | EN | ES | FR

Sweet potato plant

Sweet potato tubers can almost double in size in carbon dioxide-rich conditions, research has found

Forest & Kim Starr

[LIMA] Rising levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere caused by human-driven emissions might lead to larger sweet potatoes, a staple food for many African and Asian countries, research reveals.

Sweet potatoes could double in size with the increase in CO2 levels currently forecasted for the end of this century, according to research by a team from the University of Hawaii, United States. The team  presented their finding at a meeting of the American Geophysical Union, in San Francisco this month (3-7 December).

SPEED READ

  • Sweet potatoes grown in high carbon dioxide conditions almost doubled in size
  • Researchers are studying how this affects nutritional content of enlarged tubers
  • But a hotter future planet may hinder the crop's growth

The researchers grew a white-fleshed sweet potato variety from Hawaii in two types of fertiliser at current CO2 levels of 352 parts per million (ppm), as well as in three raised CO2 environments: 763, 1,108 and 1,515 ppm.

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, atmospheric CO2 levels will be between 500 and 1,000 ppm by the year 2100.

Even at 763 ppm of CO2, the tubers grew up to 96 per cent larger.

"It is more than likely that we will be reaching much higher CO2 levels than previously expected and it is therefore important to understand how plants will respond to elevated CO2 at much higher concentrations," Ben Czeck, one of the researchers, tells SciDev.Net.

In addition, he says that climate change is expected to do the most harm to developing countries that rely heavily on root crops such as sweet potato.

The researchers now want to find out if growing larger sweet potatoes will have any negative impact on their nutritional content, Czeck says.

Previous studies revealed that the protein content in wheat, rice, barley and potatoes dropped by 15 per cent when grown under CO2 levels double those of today. The drop is caused by a series of impacts on plant physiology stemming from the higher levels of the gas.

"The nutritional contents we are looking at are calories, dietary fibre, protein, sugars and micro- and macro-minerals," Czeck says.

Orange- and purple-fleshed varieties of sweet potato are rich in beta-carotene, which the body converts to vitamin A. They are being grown to try to reduce child malnutrition in African countries.

Gabriela Burgos, who leads the Quality and Nutrition Lab at the International Potato Center (CIP), in Peru, says it is vital to study how raised CO2 levels will affect root and tuber crops, because much of the world's population depends on them for food.

"At CIP, we are trying to add more nutritional content to potato and sweet potato varieties, but if in a few years those varieties are going to be oversize, their nutritional content could be diluted," she tells SciDev.Net. So it is good to have some way of dealing with the anticipated changes, she adds.  

But Wolfang Gruneberg, CIP geneticist and sweet potato breeder, thinks the real problem will not be higher atmospheric CO2 levels but the effect of raised temperatures on plants.

"Plants use water to cool down. There are many places in the tropical world with drought. So the problem is not going to be the carbon dioxide but the [extra] heat that it would generate," he says.

CIP is evaluating the temperature range that sweet potatoes can withstand. As part of this, Gruneberg is planting a number of sweet potato varieties from CIP's genebank — the most complete of the world — in the hottest areas in north Peru.

Link to the presentation poster [2.42MB]

Comments (2)

GlennScherer ( United States of America )

30 December 2012

Unfortunately, humans – and that includes scientists – often jump to the conclusion that bigger is better. It very often is not. Here's why in this case:

"A small but growing body of research is finding that elevated levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, while increasing crop yield, decrease the nutritional value of plants. More than a hundred studies, for example, have found that when CO2 from fossil-fuel burning builds up in plant tissues, nitrogen (essential for making protein) declines. A smaller number of studies hint at another troubling impact: As atmospheric CO2 levels go up, trace elements in plants (such as zinc and iron, which are vital to animal and human life) go down, potentially malnourishing all those that subsist on the plants. This preliminary research has given scientists reason to worry about bigger unknowns: Virtually no studies have been done on the effects of elevated CO2 on other essential trace elements, such as selenium, an important antioxidant, or chromium, which is believed to regulate blood-sugar levels."

What research that has been done has shown, for example, that insects feeding on CO2 engorged plants end up dying from malnutrition. Reason: you must eat twice as much to get full nutritional value.

See more at:

http://grist.org/article/scherer-plantchem/

John ( United States of America )

7 January 2013

It is heartening to see that nutrition has become so mainstream that people immediately look beyond the mere quantity of food and ask about its nutritional quality, too! (Quantity is still important, though, given that millions and millions of people do not have enough to eat. Even if this is often more a matter of affordability or accessibility rather than availability...)

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top