Skip Navigation

Health: Clinical ethics

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Indian science tangled up in red tape

Source: Current Science

10 November 2006 | EN | 中文

Indian researchers must make more links with industry

Indian researchers face too many bureaucratic hurdles

FAO

India's rich biodiversity offers scientists a unique resource and the opportunity to understand local environments, audit natural resource management systems and document wildlife.

Yet across all disciplines, scientists in India are being prevented from conducting their research, says Kamaljit S. Bawa in this commentary.

He draws on two articles, also published in Current Science, to show how Indian bureaucracy is stifling national scientific endeavour.

First, many field researchers are being arbitrarily denied access to wildlife reserves and protected areas in India, without the means to appeal, by forest departments that see scientists as finger-pointing busybodies whose research findings are often a source of embarrassment.

Taxonomists face further barriers to research because of India's 2002 Biological Diversity Act. This places impractical conditions on the international exchange of specimens and causes unnecessary delays in identifying wildlife.

Bureaucratic hurdles do not only hamper critical research, Bawa argues, they are also undemocratic.  

It follows that if India is to become a global leader in conservation science it must first free its scientific community from red tape, and actively encourage field-based research.

Link to full articles in Current Science

Biological Diversity Act, 2002: Shadow of permit-raj over research

Science in the wilderness: the predicament of scientific research in India's wildlife reserves

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top