Skip Navigation

Features

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Chagas disease: The lost century

Janet Kilby

17 July 2009 | EN

A boy with Chagas disease: 15,000 people die from the disease every year

CDC

It is a hundred years since the discovery of Chagas disease — but progress in eliminating it has been marred by lost opportunities, say campaigners.

Of all the forgotten diseases, Chagas is one of the least well known. Much of the world has never heard of it. Yet 14 million people are affected and 15,000 die from it. So it was hardly surprising that advocacy groups were delighted when Chagas was included on the agenda for last May’s World Health Assembly in Geneva, Switzerland — a meeting of health ministers organised by the WHO.

Here, at last, was the chance for countries to step up their commitment to tackling this insect-borne disease. The timing was providential — 2009 is the 100th anniversary of the disease’s discovery by Brazilian doctor and scientist, Carlos Chagas.

Shelved for swine flu

But the meeting ended in anticlimax for Chagas campaigners. The WHO reduced its agenda so that officials could discuss pandemic readiness and then return home five days early to prepare for the spread of swine flu. As a result, discussions on Chagas were shelved until 2010.

Roger Teck, director of operations for Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), was dismayed.

"We had expected that the WHO would adopt a resolution where all affected countries agree to integrate care of acute and chronic Chagas patients into their primary healthcare systems, and to invest more in research," he said. His colleague, Gemma Ortiz, told Reuters she was "completely amazed and gutted at the same time".

Chagas: a neglected disease

Chagas disease is a debilitating and often fatal disease resulting from infection with the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi. T. cruzi passes to humans via triatomes — a subfamily of predatory insects endemic to Mexico, Central America, and South America. These insects, sometimes known as 'kissing bugs' because of their attraction to human faces, thrive in straw and clay homes, taking shelter in cracks in the walls during the day and emerging at night. Typically, an insect will jump and glide until it lands on a sleeping person. It will then proceed to bite the flesh — often near the eyes or mouth — and defecate. The disease spreads when a victim scratches the site of a bite and unknowingly rubs parasite-laden faeces into the blood system.

It has become increasingly clear in recent years that T. cruzi can also be transmitted in blood and organs from infected donors. And women can infect their children during pregnancy, delivery or while breastfeeding.

The disease was discovered by Brazilian doctor and scientist, Carlos Chagas

Wikicommons/J Pinto

There is no vaccine against Chagas disease. Patients are generally treated with one of two drugs, nifurtimox and benznidazole, both of which are old, toxic and lacking in specificity. They are, however, relatively successful at treating early-stage (acute) infections.

But there's the rub — the early phase of infection often goes undetected as symptoms are usually mild. Sometimes patients note a fever, headache or diarrhoea but often symptoms go no further than a swelling at the site of infection. It is usually many years later — as many as 15 — that the chronic phase of infection sets in and it is at this stage that infected people experience serious symptoms. An estimated 30 per cent develop heart disease and gastrointestinal tract disease, usually leading to disability and death. Drugs are generally ineffective at this stage.

Chagas is the disease with the highest impact in Latin America. It is probably causing over two-and-a-half times more lost years of healthy life than malaria, leprosy, bilharzia and leishmaniasis combined. Yet little is being done to improve its treatment or prevention. Why?

A disease of the poor

The main obstacle appears to be the population profile of those most burdened by the disease. Chagas affects the poor in remote rural areas, making it a commercially unviable candidate for drug development. The WHO categorises Chagas as a neglected tropical disease, recognising that more research is essential — there are gaps in medical knowledge at the most basic level. Even the optimum length of treatment remains unknown.

Better drugs with fewer side-effects are urgently needed, says Luis Eugenio Portela Fernandes de Souza, former director of the Science and Technology Department of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. It is also vital to create an infrastructure in Central and Southern America that allows populations to be screened for the condition, and treatment to be delivered effectively. But such an infrastructure poses an enormous challenge as many afflicted communities have no access to health care systems.
Another area that needs urgent attention is diagnosis, de Souza says. There is no standardised diagnostic test on the market, says the UK medical journal The Lancet.
And the challenges do not end there. Where Chagas disease is endemic, it must also be a top priority to methodically kill the insect vector so that treated people don’t become re-infected.

It must be a top priority to methodically kill the 'kissing bugs' that carry the disease

Flickr/gauchocat

There are positive precedents for insect-control programmes. In Uruguay, Chile, and Brazil, for instance, the main vector that transmits the disease has been virtually eliminated.

Unrealistic aims

But with 50,000 new cases of Chagas reported every year, these examples of disease prevention are clearly not enough.

"The focus on prevention ignores the needs of those who are already infected and are suffering in silence. In endemic countries, governments should do active screening, diagnose and treat many more patients," says Ortiz, MSF’s senior advocacy officer for Chagas.

The WHO appeared to acknowledge the problem in 2007 when it launched its Global Network for Chagas Elimination — an initiative that aims to coordinate global efforts to eliminate the disease by 2010.

But cellular biologist Rick Tarleton is not holding his breath. Setting deadlines without properly understanding the scale of the problem and the potential impediments is simply wishful thinking, he says.

Tarleton, a researcher from the Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases at the US-based University of Georgia, says of the 2007 initiative: "Although 2010 is a laudable goal, it seems doomed to failure from the start — how can a disease be eliminated in two and a half years when there is no good estimate of the full impact, no real plan for how elimination would be achieved, and no truly effective tools for diagnosis, treatment and assessment of the effectiveness of interventions?".

Global spread?

Writing in The Lancet, Ricardo Pereira Igreja, from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, in Brazil, notes that Chagas is no longer simply a bug-transmitted disease endemic to rural areas of Latin America, but an urban, globalised disease with new clinical presentations.

Growing human migration and mobility have increased the geographic distribution of Chagas in recent decades and the disease now has the potential to become an international threat.

Cases are being seen in travellers to North America, Europe and Japan.

What’s more, new means of Chagas transmission are emerging — infections from contaminated food and even fruit juice have been reported. Sharing intravenous needles is another relatively new means of transmitting T. cruzi infection. The insect vectors appear to be developing resistance to pesticides.

There is hope that new drugs will be developed once the T.cruzi genome is completely sequenced

Wikicommons/CDC

Joseli Lannes, researcher at the Oswaldo Cruz Institute at Fiocruz in Brazil, and a coordinator of the Institute's Integrated Programme on Chagas Disease, told SciDev.Net that new species of insects starting to spread the disease.

This has resulted from human actions, says Lannes. Environmental destruction has reduced the pool of wild animals from which insects would traditionally feed, forcing a wider variety of kissing bug to turn to humans for food.
To Tarleton, the challenges posed by Chagas disease are frustratingly plentiful, both from an operational standpoint — how to make use of accessible resources to prevent new infections or treat existing ones — and from a research perspective.

New treatments, new money?

For those who can afford it there are glimmers of hope. Direct stem cell therapy of the heart muscle using bone marrow cell transplantation shows promise as a way to reduce heart failure in patients with chronic Chagas disease.

There is also hope that new drugs will be developed once the T. cruzi genome is completely sequenced. Several experimental treatments have shown promise in animal models and a number of potential vaccines are being tested.

Lannes is optimistic that drugs being developed for leishmaniasis and African trypanosomiasis (African sleeping sickness) may also be useful for treating Chagas disease. All three conditions are caused by parasites from the Trypanosomatidae family, and in recent years there has been a degree of consolidation in international efforts to find treatments for these diseases.

But arguably the most significant development for victims of Chagas disease is the recent establishment of a Therapeutics for Rare and Neglected Diseases programme in the United States. This initiative, launched in May by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH), aims to speed up drug development and to stimulate research collaborations. With the NIH pumping US$24 million into this year's budget for the programme and Chagas disease on the agenda, perhaps there is a chance that this vexing condition will finally receive the attention it so desperately needs.

Comments (4)

Jorge Casale ( Argentina )

20 July 2009

Research on diagnosis, drugs and treatments for Chagas disease are all very good, but it is still better if we concentrate on fighting the vector. Insecticides show promise, but adding new chemicals to which the insect will sooner or later adapt is not the best way. I would call enthomologists to try to find biopractices that would control the vector without the use of pesticides.

ALVARO MONCAYO ( Colombia )

24 July 2009

Dear Sir, I was surprised to read in your weekly update (13-19 July 2009) the note entitled "Chagas disease: the lost century". It seems that the author of the note is not looking at the whole picture of the current situation of this disease on the continent. It is hard to be unaware of the important achievements in vector control and the elimination of vectorial transmission in three Latin American countries, namely Uruguay (in 1997), Chile (1999) and Brazil (2006). This has reduced, for the whole of Latin America, the yearly incidence of infections from 700 000 in 1990 to 41 200 in 2006, a drop of 90% and the deaths due to Chagas disease from 45 000 to 12 000 in the same period. The author of the note might wish to consult the following document: WHO/TDR - World Health Organization 2006. Report of the Scientific Working Group on Chagas disease, Buenos Aires, Geneva, p. 7. The figures presented therein are enough to change the title of the note into a different one: "Chagas disease: the century of progress"!! Yours sincerely, Alvaro Moncayo MD

Abdallah Samy ( Ain Shams University | Egypt )

31 July 2009

Good comment ALVARO, Jorge! but we would like to take attention that control program of any vector transmitted diseases (VTDs) require optimization of three dimensions stepwise process that begin with two; vector control and treatment of patients; both in parallel with vaccination against the disease, the hard step for all scientists worldwide especially that all researchers on VTDs try to produce the target candidate vaccine. The first priority is the vector control although control of vector eliminates the post-transmission of the disease for reducing disease risk/incidence in the future and not the current disease status! Results in the long run; exactly what Alvaro refers to in the Brazilian study. If you give a look to Joseli Lannes talks to SciDev.Net, you will remember directly what Schrag and Wiener said in the paper published by Trends in Ecology and Evolution journal in 1995 that the increase in infectious diseases was partly attributed to the effect of humans on the evolution of parasites, but mostly to human-induced changes in the ecology of host–pathogen, and vector-pathogen interactions. Latter factors may affect the vectorial efficiency, appearance of new species that may be potent with vectorial efficiency than that reported before especially with the effect of global warming, one important issue affect the distribution of VTDs.

Nelson Salazar ( United States of America )

12 October 2010

Given that the amounts of people are increasing, does anyone knows what needs to be done to diagnose the disease? I would not want to wait until is to late to treat it.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Features
To the top

<

Information Services