Skip Navigation

Climate Change & Energy: Science in the Islamic world

News

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Saudi universities shrug off row over scientists' salaries

Marwan Almuraisy

26 January 2012 | EN | FR

Islam Analysis: Science reforms need to show results

King Saud University has received US$2 billion funding this year

Wikipedia/abrnkak

[RIYADH] Saudi Arabia has given a major funding boost to its higher education sector, reviving a debate that erupted late last year about the country's motives in recruiting high calibre international scientists to its leading universities.

The annual overall budget for education this year will be about US$44 billion, 13 per cent higher than last year's allocation.

The country's two leading universities, King Abdulaziz University (KAU) in Jeddah and King Saud University (KSU) in Riyadh, have received the largest slice of the pie, with a total allocation of US$3 billion between them.

Out of this total, KSU will receive US$2 billion and KAU US$1 billion. A breakdown of how this money will be distributed by the universities has not yet been published.

The funding decisions come on the heels of a debate started by an article in Science magazine last month accusing KAU and KSU of recruiting highly-cited researchers as members of their staff as a way of improving their international rankings.

The article claimed that, as a result of this tactic, the two universities have climbed several hundred places in international rankings in the past four years. They achieved this partly by being able to attach their names to the research publications of highly-cited researchers, regardless of whether the work involved any meaningful collaboration with the universities.

KSU is currently listed among the world's top 300 universities, according to the 2011 edition of the widely-quoted Academic Ranking of World Universities. In 2008 it failed to make the top 500.

Similarly Webometrics, a directory that lists universities according to their Internet presence, ranked KSU 186th in 2011; in 2006 it was ranked 2,910th.

The Science article ignited a heated debate among Saudi academics, forcing both universities to issue statements clarifying the motives of their recruitment programmes.

"Attracting highly-cited researchers from various international universities and research centres is … an arrangement that is legitimate and exists in many top-notch universities," said Adnan Bin Hamza Muhammad Zahed, KAU vice president for graduate studies and scientific research in KAU's statement.

He added that it was "a well-considered and sound investment for the future of Saudi Arabia".

Mohammed A. Alshaikh, the former dean of graduate studies at KSU, said in Al Hayat newspaper earlier this month that, having read the KAU's response, he doubted whether the Science article would make a significant impact.

He added: "There are clear defects in the research programmes that cannot be accepted by any local or global university mindful of its reputation."

And Mohamed Aref — science economics consultant at the Arab Science and Technology Foundation — said that, although a university like KSA is flourishing, "scientific research ethics have to be one of the most important values to the university".

 

In an article in the newspaper Al Ittihad earlier this month (12 January), he called on the university not sacrifice its moral integrity for any reason.  

Link to full article in Science

References

Science doi:10.1126/science.334.6061.1344 (2011)

Comments (4)

Sayda ( Sudan )

28 January 2012

Congratulations to KSU staff members for this outstanding success in getting the 186th position in the international universites hoping that this year (2012) will be among the first 100
Dr. Sayda A.M.Ali
Gezira University

Denis Tange ( University of Ghana | Ghana )

2 February 2012

this is a good initiative. keep up

Naiyyum Choudhury ( Bangladesh )

4 February 2012

I do not understand what is wrong in KAU and KSU of recruiting highly-cited researchers as members of their staff as a way of improving their international rankings as mentioned by Science magazine. I did not expect this criticism from a prestigious journal like Science. Does it mean that KSA investment in education and research in cutting age science in the tertiary education has to develop indigenously from the barren deserts of KSA? Or has it happened anywhere else including USA? What is behind top ranking of American universities nowadays? Is it not through hiring of brains from here, there and everywhere?

I thought one should praise the Saudi government at least for realizing that there is no alternative to getting into real scientific endeavour for development in the true sense of the term. Petro dollars will not last long. As for scientific community they are above all shallowness and will have a universal attitude and will make them available where needed if there is incentive in doing so. I congratulate the government of the KSA for investing in science and technology and science education. Investing in science is better than indulging in luxury. I request Science to cite an example of KSA to other rich Middle East countries which are rich but shy of spending in science and technology.

Lodoun ( Burkina Faso )

9 February 2012

Congratulation to Saudi Arabia leaders for their clairvoyance. Nowadays, everybody is aware of the fact that the best way to insure the future is investment in youths' education. Accordingly, there is no sin in gathering the best scientists of the world to train young. That is rather a seek for excellence that must be encouraged. Ensuring genuine education to youths is better than wasting state assets in luxurious cars, houses and other foreign items like we are used to seeing in Africa. I think the author of the article should rather encourage leaders in Sub-Saharan Africa to follow the footprints of their counterparts in Arab countries by focusing more on the education of young people for a better future.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to News
To the top