
Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
Mercedes Iriarte testing SODIS in a laboratory setting
CASA Universidad Mayor de San Simón
[LA PAZ] Doubt has been cast on a much-lauded method of disinfecting water using only sunlight, after a study found that it doesn't reduce diarrhoea among children in families using the technique.
Solar Water Disinfection (SODIS), a low-cost water purification method that uses only sunlight to disinfect water, is currently used by about three million people in 30 countries, according to the SODIS Reference Center in Switzerland.
Contaminated water is poured into transparent plastic bottles and exposed to sunlight for six hours, killing pathogens with ultraviolet radiation (see Sun's rays 'can clean water in tsunami zone').
Laboratory and community studies have shown that the method is effective. But a PLoS Medicine study published last week (18 August) on 22 rural communities in Cochabamba, Bolivia, found no significant reduction in diarrhoea among children aged five and under in families using SODIS.
The authors suggest that more research is needed into how the laboratory results can be replicated on the ground and until this is done they say that campaigners should be careful about advocating SODIS.
Mercedes Iriarte, co-author of the study and a researcher at the Water and Environmental Sanitation Centre of San Simón University, in Bolivia, told SciDev.Net that in the laboratory there is better control of all factors.
Iriarte says that in the laboratory, clean, clear, pH-neutral water is contaminated with known microorganisms to evaluate the method but that in the field researchers should consider other factors such as cloudiness of the water.
"Other variables are consumption of treated water from dirty containers and inadequate storage," she says. Children could also be infected with microorganisms from sources other than drinking water.
Margot Franken, a researcher with the environmental quality unit at San Andrés University in Bolivia, told SciDev.Net that low efficacy of the method could also result from inadequate exposure to sunlight. "Maybe people did not expose the water for enough time, did it on roofs that did not have optimal solar orientation — or they did it on cloudy days," she says.
Compliance was also low, with only a third of families using the technique despite 80 per cent claiming to.
In a comment about the study on its website, the SODIS Reference Center says that "numerous studies have reported health benefits of SODIS when it is correctly and consistently used".
Gerd Foerch ( University of Siegen | Germany )
1 September 2009
Malcolm White ( Irish Aid (formerly Development Cooperation Ireland DCI) | South Africa )
25 September 2009
Dr.A.Jagadeesh ( Nayudamma Centre for Development Alternatives | India )
31 July 2011
Yes.
This method suffers from some drawbacks. The PET Bottles get scratches which lessens the transmittance of sunlight. When put it open dust accumulates in the groves of the PET Bottles. There is a warning printed on the PET Bottles in India, CRUSH THE BOTTLE AFTER USE. Moreover if one uses PET bottles for longer time there will be brown colour formation inside bottom. A Chemical DAHE in the PET Bottle is not safe.
When the PET bottles are put in open there is the WIND Effect which reduces the temperature.
Both UV and Thermal are needed for eradication of bacteria.
50 degrees Celsius is the crucial.
I have refined the method by using Glass Bottles(Clear ) which are available in India at about 1 Cent (Used wine Bottles).
The innovative solar disinfection system has a wooden frame of length 2 ft,width 1 foot and depth 6 inches with bottom sinusoidal shaped polished stainless steel (curvature slightly larger than standard glass wine bottles, about 5 inches diameter) . On the front is fixed a glass sheet having lifting arrangement with a knob (this glass enclosure will protect the glass bottles from cooling down due to outside wind). There are screws which can be used to keep the contents airtight. On the backside a stand is fixed which will help the unit to be placed according to the latitude of the place for maximum solar insolation.
In this method clear glass bottles (used wine bottles) are utilised instead of PET bottles as the former are easy to clean, lasts longer and are available at a low cost in India. Solar disinfection is more efficient in water containing high levels of oxygen; sunlight produces highly reactive forms of oxygen (oxygen free radicals and hydrogen peroxides) in the water. These reactive forms of oxygen kill the microorganisms. Aeration of water is achieved by shaking the 3/4 water filled bottles for about 20 seconds before they are filled completely.
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.
17 February 2012