Many countries may want to retain data to do their own research
Flickr/DFID
Persuading nations to release data for an international climate database will take years and millions of dollars, meteorologists admitted this week at a meeting aiming to explore how to move such an enterprise forwards.
For nations to understand the effects that climate change will have on their locality, it is essential to gather local data into an internationally coordinated database, the meeting, organised by the UK's Meteorological Office, agreed.
But many countries could sell the same data elsewhere, for example to a commercial company, or may want to retain it in order to do their own research, said delegates at the 'Primary Workshop on Land-surface temperature: Data sets for the 21st Century' held in Exeter, United Kingdom (7–9 September).
Others simply do not have the data — or have it but cannot afford to digitise it.
The workshop was convened to initiate discussions on creating a freely available database of land surface temperatures following a decision made at the World Meteorological Organisation's Commission for Climatology meeting held in Turkey last February.
"Policymakers haven't fully understood how important this data is, and how it's being done with just a few scientists around the world — and has produced great results, such as discerning the reality of global warming," said Peter Stott, chair of the international committee for the meeting, from the UK Meteorological Office's Hadley Centre.
"We would like to look in much more detail at the effects [of climate change] that we will see," he added.
In particular, there is a lack of data available at a high temporal and spatial resolution — data collected more than once a day at a resolution of few kilometres at most.
"I think we have an obligation to the world," said Joseph Mukuria of the Kenya Meteorological Department. "We need to put forward more data for the global models so they can be able to pick up the necessary issues on the more specific, local levels."
"In Argentina we are inclined to give the data to the global dataset, because we understand that it is important for us to support analysis of this data," said Matilde Rusticucci, atmospheric and oceanic scientist from the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
Stott told SciDev.Net it was understandable that countries do not want to part with data that they have spent years collecting before they have done their own research and published papers on it.
"There is also the issue of priority," said Mukuria. Developing countries are preoccupied with economic issues and food security, he said, so they do not focus on data.
"It is high time that we taught them that the data they gather will help the economy as well."
Jayashnee Revadekar, from the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, said his institute was happy to share original data it had collected, but that some of its research is based on datasets acquired from other sources, and so cannot be shared.
A group created at the meeting will draw up a plan for the next year, said Stott.
Suad Sulaiman ( Sudan )
13 September 2010
Gyananath ( India )
2 November 2010
Rick @ IEDRO.ORG ( International Environmental Data Rescue Organization | United States of America )
28 February 2011
Having worked in the NWS International Activities Office and now the Executive Director of the International Environmental Data Rescue Organization (IEDRO.ORG) a non-profit with Data Rescue & Digitization (DR&D) projects in 14 countries. In my opinion, the majority (but not all)of developing countries holding the data most at risk, have no idea (1) what data is important to them or anyone else and (2) what they could produce if they had digitized historic data. A majority of our initial African sites thought their best return on the DR&D effort is freeing up space for more offices!
As proof, look at the failure of the Belgian-funded African Microfiche Program DARE-I. Forty-six African countries took part and at the end of the project, approximately 30,000,000, mainly surface observations, were “rescued” on 100,000 microfiche. Each country was given a set of their observations on microfiche along with two microfiche readers. As of 2008 (about a decade after the end of the project), not one of the 46 countries has an operational microfiche reader or their set of observations rescued and placed on microfiche. Why? They had absolutely no idea to what use those observations could be placed and no one in the “developed” countries bothered to educate them. So we cannot ask them what they want, we have to educate them as to why they need to save the data and what wonderful products the digitized data can produce, with our help and training.
The other “customers” are those agencies, and individuals who learn how important the rescued and digitized data are to all countries and all citizens as well as to their own organizations whose mandates may include alleviation of hunger, stopping the spread of disease, encouraging rural development, avoiding deaths due to flooding. Even historians need our data which can explain shifts in culture, migrations, and foundations of conflicts.
PLEASE contact me with your ideas. Rick R.Crouthamel@IEDRO.ORG.
Rick @ IEDRO.ORG ( International Environmental Data Rescue Organization | United States of America )
28 February 2011
an additional thought...
While Data Rescue and Digitization (DR&D) is a critical part of climate change research and applications, other communities are also important users of the digitized historic weather data. We’ve had good conversations with researchers at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH)and the Center of Disease Control (CDC) who use historic weather observations to correlate with disease spread primarily of Malaria, West Nile Virus, Yellow and and Dengue Fevers. These are not “climate” issues but correlations between old “weather” observations and disease spread.
Rick
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.
22 May 2013