Skip Navigation

Climate Change & Energy: Biofuels

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Biofuels: countries advised to follow Brazilian lead

Source: Science

12 February 2007 | EN

Brazil has been producing ethanol from sugarcane since the 1970s

Brazil has been producing ethanol from sugarcane since the 1970s

Rufino Uribe

Developing countries should replicate Brazil's programme for producing sugarcane ethanol to ensure a sustainable energy future, says Sao Paulo's secretary for the environment.

José Goldemberg argues that ethanol production can be introduced to other countries at little cost to natural ecosystems.

Renewable sources of energy, such as biomass, currently make up just 13.6 per cent of global energy supplies, even though they are widely available and less polluting than fossil fuels.

Their widespread adoption is limited by the costs associated with importing the technology, such as wind turbines and solar panels.

But the Brazilian ethanol programme — launched in the 1970s — is based on indigenous industrial and agricultural technology that does not depend on imports, says Goldemberg in this article in Science.

Each year Brazil produces 16 billion litres of ethanol from sugarcane planted on three million hectares of land. Goldemberg suggests that expanding the Brazilian programme by a factor of ten in Brazil and other countries would supply enough ethanol to replace ten per cent of gasoline used by the world today.

Link to full article in Science

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top