Skip Navigation

China

Opinions

'Energy grasses' need careful consideration

Source: China Dialogue

9 September 2008 | EN | 中文

sorghum_flickr_RaeA.jpg

Shrubs like sorghum have been hailed as a biomass alternative to fossil fuels.

Flickr/RaeA

'Energy grasses', grown specifically to generate power, are attracting excitement as an alternative energy source, but some of the claims are greatly exaggerated, says Jiang Gaoming.

Plants such as biannual or perennial grass, and shrubs like sorghum, willow and miscanthus, have been hailed as a biomass alternative to fossil fuels.

They are quick growing, can be harvested repeatedly, and are tolerant to arid and saline conditions so can be grown on otherwise unproductive land. But harvesting costs are high and land sources are geographically scattered and may be home to important biodiversity.

Gaoming warns that producing enough energy grass to meet demand would involve large inputs of fertiliser and water that could, in some areas, even offset the original goal of replacing fossil fuels.

Energy grasses may relieve the energy crisis to some extent, he says, but their potential failings need more scrutiny, particularly since large-scale planting could end up competing with food crops for land and resources.

Link to full article in China Dialogue

Comments

Stephen Klaber ( United States of America )

15 September 2008

Consider those places that are overwhelmed with energy grasses now: in Africa, Lake Chad and Lake Jipe and more rivers than not are clogged with Typha or water hyacinth et al. The control of aquatic weeds and grasses is a never-ending job that can best be funded by exploiting them for energy.

Add your comment

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

Back to Opinions
To the top