
Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
Source: New Scientist
19 April 2011 | EN
Demand for cereal crops is expected to double by 2050
Flickr/CIMMYT
Conservationists and agriculturalists must harness new, integrated approaches to achieve biodiversity and agricultural goals, argues Achim Steiner, executive director of the UN Environment Programme.
Agricultural development is the only way to meet the food needs of our growing population, says Steiner. But this will require large amounts of agricultural land — up to 17 million square kilometres by 2050.
The expansion of agricultural land could intensify declines in biodiversity and increase greenhouse gas emissions, he warns, bringing the world "closer to ecological tipping points that could strain the global life-support systems upon which agriculture itself depends".
Steiner calls for a "new agriculture", where the value of ecosystem services such as food and water is built into food production costs, and a "new conservation" that enables conservationists to work with the agricultural sector.
He suggests factoring the environmental costs of production into the price of ecosystem goods and services by providing incentives for carbon sequestration, and putting in place monitoring and reward payment systems for farmers who manage land sustainably.
There are signs of progress towards this goal, says Steiner. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, an international research project, is calculating the costs of biodiversity and ecosystem degradation. And the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services will be a forum where agriculture and conservation knowledge will be integrated and translated into policy.
erich ( United States of America )
27 April 2011
Our farming for over 10,000 years has been responsible for 2/3rds of our excess greenhouse gases. This soil carbon, converted to carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide began a slow stable warming that now accelerates with burning of fossil fuel. The unintended consequence has been the flowering of our civilization. Our science has now realized the consequences and developed a more encompassing wisdom.
Modern Agriculture has evolved in the ability to remove the limitations to plant growth, from burning forest for ash fertilizers, to bison bones, to Guano islands, then in 1913, to crafty Germans figuring out how to suck nitrogen from the air to now with natural gas derived fertilizers. These chemical fertilizers have over come nutrient limits to growth for 100 years.
NPK and the "Green Revolution" in genetics have brought us to where we are, all made possible by basically mining soil carbon stocks. So we have now hit a carbon limit in two distinct ways. The first is continued loss of soil carbon content, the second is fossil carbon energy cost. The present farming system spends ten cents of fossil energy delivering one cent of food energy.
We can not go back, but we can go forward with our newly acquired wisdom. Wise land management, Conservation Agriculture and afforestation can build back our soil carbon, Biochar allows the soil food web to build much more recalcitrant organic carbon, (living biomass & Glomalins) in addition to the carbon in the biochar.
We can rectify the carbon cycle, and beyond that, biochar systems serve the same healing function for the nitrogen and phosphorous cycles, toxicity in soils and sediments and as a feed additive cut the carbon foot print of livestock by 50%.
2010 ISU, US Focused Biochar report: Assessment of Biochar's Benefits for the USA
http://www.biochar-us.org/pdf%20files/biochar_report_lowres.pdf
Carbon to the Soil, the only ubiquitous and economic place to put it.
erich ( United States of America )
27 April 2011
A dream I've had for years is to base the coming carbon economy firmly on the foundation of top soils. My read of the agronomic history of civilization shows that the Kayopo Amazon Indians and the Egyptians were the only ones to maintain fertility for the long haul, millennium scales. Egypt has now forsaken their geologic advantage by building the Aswan dam, and are stuck, with the rest of us, in the soil C mining, NPK rat race to the bottom. The meta-analysis of Syn-N and soil Carbon content show our dilemma;
https://www.agronomy.org/publications/jeq/articles/38/6/2295
The Ag Soil Carbon standard is in final review by the AMS branch at USDA. Both Congresional Ag Committees have asked for expansion of Soil Carbon Standard to ISO status.
Read over the work so far;
http://www.novecta.com/documents/Carbon-Standard.pdf
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.
27 May 2012