
Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
14 January 2009 | EN
Mangrove forest in India
Flickr/bbjee
[CHENNAI] Claims that coastal forests can protect communities from the impact of tsunamis have been dismissed in a new report.
Researchers analysed the pattern of damage that occurred during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami and say that there is no compelling evidence that coastal forests — such as mangroves — can act as 'bioshields' to adequately protect against tsunamis or cyclone storm surges. The full report is soon to be published by the UN Environment Programme.
They go on to say that it would be "extremely dangerous" to rely on tree-planting alone to protect coastal communities.
Other factors, such as the height of a village above sea level and its distance from the shore need to be incorporated into an extensive, statistically sound analysis of which factors determine the impact of tsunamis.
Following the 2004 tsunami, studies claimed there was less damage to communities where there was a tree or vegetation barrier. Naluvedapathy — a coastal village in the state of Tamil Nadu — hit the headlines as a village that was saved by its bank of 60,000 casuarina and eucalyptus trees.
Bioshields have now become part of India's National Disaster Management Plan and official policy, and many organisations have established programmes in the country.
In 2005, 254,464 trees were planted in a single day in Vedaranyam, Tamil Nadu, and state forest departments have been funded by the World Bank's Emergency Tsunami Reconstruction Project to plant trees.
The M.S. Swaminathan Research Foundation (MSSRF) has also spent more than six million Indian rupees (about US$120,000) on bioshield research.
"Increasing green cover in any area is not waste of money … [The study] needs to be ignored," V. Selvam, programme director of Coastal Systems Research at MSSRF, told SciDev.Net.
"Enough field-based and laboratory-oriented studies have been conducted to provide proof that bioshields can mitigate the impact of tsunamis. This conclusion is accepted by many global organisations," he said.
But Andrew Baird of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies and James Cook University, Australia, who led the study, says in a press release: "In my own visits to the tsunami-ravaged areas, I saw places where quite heavy vegetation had provided absolutely no protection at all against the force of the ocean."
P Suresh ( India )
1 November 2011
True, the ocean is very mighty. But, even tides face resistance when they encounter mangrove forests. Thus, the tidal force will definitely get dampened. It could be possible that the tidal force is different in different regions. Let us not forget that a tsunami gets created due to earthquake in the deep sea. Craters of earth being uneven, the line of the quake will also be uneven. Thus, it is only possible that tidal force that hit the coastal border was different at different regions. I strongly feel that mangroves did reduce the force, but the tides were even more powerful and hence did penetrate as much deep as it had done in other areas. Well yes, a country that has 3700 kilometers of coastal lines should not depend only on mangroves. But, then, the houses etc can be planned in such a manner that at vulnerable spots as along Bay of Bengal, no houses are allowed anywhere along the first 3 - 4 kms of the border and regular housing starts only after that. Those 3-4 kms could be used for mangroves, cultivation etc. YES, cultivation is possible along coastal border i.e. on saline salts. Let it not be forgotten that mangroves is a collective name for several species of those plants (several hundreds of species) and that there are several lakhs of mangroves across the world. Well, mankind has the sacred duty of planning the universe. Thus, it should plant only those varieties that are suitable. It is not doing that duty, not working for nature. That is the calamity. Notwithstanding, mankind involves in routine poaching for fire wood, this and that. This is a double disservice to nature.
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.
17 February 2012