Science and Development Network
News, views and information about science, technology and the developing world
1 December 2004 | EN
Mike Shanahan and Eshan Masood summarise the latest data on the world's biodiversity, with facts and figures on its value and efforts to conserve it.
This feature contains the latest data on the extent and the distribution of the world's biodiversity. It also includes the most recent estimates of extinction threats for different groups of species, as well as facts and figures on the value of biodiversity and efforts to conserve it.
The data is based mostly on the best available sources including Conservation International, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, the World Conservation Union's 2004 Red List of Threatened Species, the World Wildlife Fund Living Planet Report, and the Earth Trends database of the World Resources Institute.
Readers will not have failed to notice that while the majority of the world's biodiversity is found in the developing world, most of the data has been collected and analysed in institutions that are based in richer countries.
Thankfully, policymakers are now turning their attention to this and several international initiatives are underway to build the biodiversity data-gathering capacity of research institutions in developing countries and to connect them to efforts in the developed world. These include the Global Biodiversity Information Facility and the Proteus project of the UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre in the UK.
Biodiversity (or biological diversity) is a collective term meaning: the totality and variety of life on Earth. Biodiversity includes genetic diversity within species; the variety among species; and the range of ecosystems within which life exists and interacts.
How many species?
Estimates of the number of species on Earth vary from 3-100 million. The UN Convention on Biological Diversity says there are some 13 million species, of which 1.75 million have been described ([1] and see below). A more updated figure comes from the World Conservation Union's 2004 Red List of Threatened Species that says 1.9 million have been described out of an estimated 5-30 million in existence. [35]
| Number of described species on Earth | |
| Species | Number |
| Bacteria | 4,000 |
| Protoctists (algae, protozoa) | 80,000 |
| Animals – vertebrates | 52,000 |
| Animals – invertebrates | 1,272,000 |
| Fungi | 72,000 |
| Plants | 270,000 |
| Total described species | 1,750,000 |
| Possible total of all species (including unknown species) | 14,000,000 |
| Source: UNEP/Global Environment Outlook (Ref 3) | |
Where is biodiversity greatest?
Generally, species density is greatest in the Southern Hemisphere.
Seventy per cent of the world's species is found in just 12 countries: Australia, Brazil, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mexico, Peru and Democratic Republic of Congo. The entire Hindu Kush-Himalayan belt has as many as 25,000 plant species, comprising 10 per cent of the world's flora. [3]
Tropical regions support two-thirds of these estimated 250,000 plant species. The highest tree diversity recorded to date is 1,175 species in a 52-hectare plot in Lambir Hills National Park, Sarawak (Malaysian Borneo). [4] Overall, tropical rainforests are thought to contain 50 to 90 per cent of all species. [5] Some 2,600 bird species (~30 per cent of the total) depend on tropical forests.
| Vascular plant species in the tropics | |
| Region | Number |
| Mexico and the Caribbean | 86,000 |
| Tropical and semi-arid Africa | 30,000 |
| Madagascar | 8,200 |
| Tropical Asia, including New Guinea and tropical Australia | 45,000 |
| Source: World Resources Institute (Ref 5) * A vascular plant is one whose tissues conduct fluids |
|
| Bird species dependent on tropical forests | |
| Region | Number |
| Latin America | 1,300 |
| Africa | 400 |
| Asia | 900 |
| Total | 2,600 |
| Source: World Resources Institute (Ref 5) | |
A biodiversity hotspot is an area of rich biodiversity that faces serious threats to its existence. The concept was developed by environmental scientist Norman Myers of Oxford University in the United Kingdom, in an attempt to identify priority areas for biodiversity conservation. [6] The best-known proponent of the hotspots thesis is the US group Conservation International (CI). CI has produced a map of hotspots on the basis of their plant diversity and the impacts upon them. In addition to harbouring at least 1,500 endemic plant species, they must also have lost more than 70 per cent of original natural vegetation to qualify as a hotspot.
Ninety-eight per cent of Madagascar's land mammals, 92 per cent of its reptiles, 68 per cent of its plants and 41 per cent of its breeding bird species exist nowhere else on Earth. [7] Sixty per cent of the plant species endemic to Ecuador'sGalapagos Islands are threatened with extinction, as are 75 per cent of the endemic plant species of the Canary Islands. [8] Twenty-five biodiversity hotspots contain 44 per cent of all plant species and 35 per cent of all terrestrial vertebrate species in only 1.4 per cent of the planet's land area.
| Hotspots at a glance | |||||||
| Area | Original hotspot area (sq km) | Hotspot area today (sq km) | Protected area (sq km) | Total plant species | Total terrestrial vertebrate species | Terrestrial vertebrates under threat* | Extinct species since 1500* |
| Atlantic Forest | 1,477,500 | 121,600 | 33,000 | 20,000 | 1,668 | 116 | 1 |
| Brazilian Cerrado | 1,783,200 | 356,630 | 92,729 | 10,000 | 1,268 | 22 | 0 |
| California Floristic Province | 324,000 | 80,000 | 31,443 | 4,426 | 584 | 12 | 0 |
| Cape Floristic Region | 74,000 | 18,000 | 14,060 | 8,200 | 562 | 15 | 2 |
| Caribbean | 263,500 | 29,840 | 41,000 | 12,000 | 1,518 | 99 | 51 |
| Caucasus | 500,000 | 50,000 | 14,050 | 6300 | 632 | 10 | 0 |
| Central Chile | 300,000 | 90,000 | 9,167 | 3,429 | 335 | 8 | 0 |
| Chocó-Darién-Western Ecuador | 260,600 | 63,000 | 16,471 | 9,000 | 1,625 | 32 | 0 |
| Eastern Arc Mountains and Coastal Forests | 30,000 | 2,000 | 5,800 | 4,000 | 1,109 | 43 | 1 |
| Guinean forests of West Africa | 1,265,000 | 126,500 | 20,324 | 9,000 | 1,320 | 70 | 0 |
| Indo-Burma | 2,060,000 | 100,000 | 100,000 | 13,500 | 2,185 | 106 | 1 |
| Madagascar and Indian Ocean Islands | 594,150 | 59,038 | 11,548 | 12,000 | 987 | 123 | 46 |
| Mediterranean Basin | 2,362,000 | 110,000 | 42,123 | 25,000 | 770 | 42 | 4 |
| Mesoamerica | 1,155,000 | 231,000 | 138,437 | 24,000 | 2,859 | 62 | 4 |
| Mountains of Southwest China | 800,000 | 64,000 | 16,562 | 12,000 | 1,141 | 34 | 0 |
| New Caledonia | 18,600 | 5,200 | 526.7 | 3,332 | 190 | 9 | 1 |
| New Zealand | 270,500 | 59,400 | 52,068 | 2,300 | 217 | 61 | 25 |
| Philippines | 300,800 | 21,000 | 25,995 | 7,620 | 1,114 | 103 | 0 |
| Polynesia and Micronesia | 46,000 | 10,024 | 4,913 | 6,557 | 342 | 88 | 38 |
| Southwest Australia | 309,850 | 33,336 | 33,336 | 5,469 | 456 | 25 | 5 |
| Succulent Karoo | 116,000 | 30,000 | 2,352 | 4,849 | 472 | 12 | 0 |
| Sundaland | 1,600,000 | 125,000 | 90,000 | 25,000 | 1,800 | 82 | 0 |
| Tropical Andes | 1,258,000 | 314,500 | 79,687 | 45,000 | 3,389 | 130 | 2 |
| Wallacea | 347,000 | 52,020 | 20,415 | 10,000 | 1,142 | 82 | 0 |
| Western Ghats and Sri Lanka | 182,500 | 12,450 | 12,450 | 4,780 | 1,073 | 31 | 0 |
| Source: Conservation International (Ref 6) * Endemic species of terrestrial vertebrate |
|||||||
A species is classified as extinct if a single individual member cannot be found despite exhaustive surveys over a long period of time. This summarises the definition used by the World Conservation Union, which compiles the periodic Red List of Threatened Species. A species being pronounced as extinct is not always the last word, however. The Vietnamese Warty Pig, for example, was listed as extinct in 1996. However, it was reclassified following the discovery of a fresh skull the following year. One mammal, the Bavarian Pine Vole, was rediscovered on the Germany-Austria border in 2000. It had previously not been seen since 1962. [35]
What are current rates of extinction?
The current rate of species extinction is many times higher than the 'background' rate – which has prevailed over long periods of geological time. The background extinction rate varies, but estimates based on the fossil record suggest that in mammals and birds, one species has been lost every 500 to 1,000 years. [9]
According to the United Nations Environment Programme's 1995 Global Biodiversity Assessment (GBA), species extinction since the year 1600 has occurred at 50 to 100 times the natural rate, and is expected to accelerate to between 1,000 and 10,000 times the natural rate by 2020. [10] The GBA states that 38 bird and mammal species became extinct between 1600 and 1810, compared to 112 species between 1810 and 1995. Of the 129 recorded bird extinctions, 103 have become extinct since 1800. This indicates an extinction rate that is 50-times that of the background rate. [35]
What is 'mass extinction'?
The permanent loss of large numbers of species over a relatively short period of geological time is known as a mass extinction. According to the fossil record, there have been five historical mass extinctions (see table below). The reasons for these are often related to changes in the Earth's environment and atmosphere. Many scientists now believe that the Earth is facing a sixth mass extinction, in part because of human activities.
| Mass extinctions | |
| Extinction period | Cause and effects |
| Late Cambrian (~500 million years ago) |
Changing sea levels |
| Late Ordovician (440 million years ago) |
Glaciation (ice age) |
| Late Devonian (~365 million years ago) |
Global cooling |
| End Permian (245 million years ago) |
96 per cent of marine species and 75 per cent of terrestrial vertebrate families became extinct during this, the largest, mass extinction – caused by fluctuations in sea level and ocean salinity resulting from climate change |
| Cretaceous-Tertiary (K-T) (65 million years ago) |
Famed for extinction of dinosaurs and widely thought to have been caused by meteor impact |
| Source: BBC Education (Ref 34) | |
The leading threats to biodiversity are: converting land to agriculture, clearing forests, climate change, pollution, unsustainable harvesting of natural resources and the introduction of so-called alien species to areas where they are not native. [11] The importance of each factor varies geographically. But one study of animal extinctions since 1600 found that 39 per cent arose mainly from the introduction of alien species, 36 per cent from habitat destruction, and 23 per cent from hunting or deliberate extermination. [12] Secondary causes of biodiversity loss include human population growth, unsustainable patterns of consumption, increasing production of waste, urban development and international conflict. [13]
How many species have become extinct recently?
At least 784 species have become extinct since the year 1500, according to the 2004 Red List of Threatened Species published by the World Conservation Union. The majority of documented extinctions have been to terrestrial species (582), followed by freshwater species (226) and marine species (15).
The actual number of extinctions may be higher still as many extinctions have either not been detected, or belong to a taxonomic group that has not been evaluated by the Red List. For example, the Global Amphibian Assessment recently added 29 extinct species to the list. By comparison, the 2000 edition of the Red List identified 766 species that have become extinct; and the 1997 Red List identified 380 species.
The numbers of mammals and insects show a decline in extinctions in the 2004 Red List. This is because of changes to the way extinctions are classified, or because they are now known to have become extinct before 1500, rather than their rediscovery.
| Species extinct (or extinct in the wild) | ||||||||
| Extinct | Extinct in wild | Total | ||||||
| Vertebrates | ||||||||
| Mammals | 73 | 4 | 77 | |||||
| Birds | 129 | 4 | 133 | |||||
| Reptiles | 21 | 1 | 22 | |||||
| Amphibians | 34 | 1 | 35 | |||||
| Fishes | 81 | 12 | 93 | |||||
| Subtotal | 338 | 22 | 360 | |||||
| Extinct | Extinct in wild | Total | ||||||
| Invertebrates | ||||||||
| Insects | 59 | 1 | 60 | |||||
| Crustaceans | 7 | 1 | 8 | |||||
| Molluscs | 291 | 12 | 303 | |||||
| Others | 2 | 0 | 2 | |||||
| Subtotal | 359 | 14 | 373 | |||||
| Extinct | Extinct in wild | Total | ||||||
| Plants | ||||||||
| Mosses | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||
| Ferns | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||
| Gymnosperms | 0 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Dicots | 78 | 20 | 98 | |||||
| Monocots | 2 | 2 | 4 | |||||
| Subtotal | 86 | 24 | 110 | |||||
| Grand total | Extinct | Extinct in wild | Total | |||||
| 784 | 60 | 844 | ||||||
| Source: Red List of Threatened Species 2004 (Ref 35) | ||||||||
The 2004 Red List of Threatened Species published by the World Conservation Union (IUCN) states the number of species threatened with extinction is15,589. This includes one in four mammals and one in eight birds. The total number of threatened animal species increased from 5,205 in 1996 to 7,266 in 2004.
The numbers of threatened species are increasing. In 2000 the Global Biodiversity Outlook, published by the UN Convention on Biological Diversity reported that 11,046 species are threatened with extinction. These included vertebrates (such as mammals, birds and fishes); invertebrates such as insects; and plants.
One of the reasons for the increase, however, is that the criteria for listing have changed over time and some of the changes in status reflect changes to the classification of species. [9]
To be classified as threatened with extinction, a species is assessed against a set of five quantitative criteria. These criteria are based on biological factors related to extinction risk and include: its rate of decline, population size, area of geographic distribution, and the degree which its population has been fragmented.
Which species are threatened?
According to the World Conservation Union (IUCN), for most taxonomic groups, only a small or extremely small proportion of described species have been evaluated for threatened status (e.g. less than 0.1 per cent of insects). At present, birds and amphibians are the organisms that have been completely evaluated. Mammals are almost all evaluated (99 per cent), but this figure is decreasing due to a large number of changes in mammalian taxonomy resulting in an increasing number of recognised species. Among plants, gymnosperms (mainly conifers and cycads) are the only major plant group to be almost completely evaluated (93 per cent).
| Rate of extinctions in recent years | ||||||||
| Number of described species | Number of species evaluated in 2004 | Number of threatened species in 1996 | Number of threatened species in 2000 | Number of threatened species in 2002 | Number of threatened species in 2003 | Number of threatened species in 2004 | Number threatened in 2004, as % of species described | |
| Vertebrates | ||||||||
| Mammals | 5,416 | 4,853 | 1,096 | 1,130 | 1,137 | 1,130 | 1,101 | 20% |
| Birds | 9,917 | 9,917 | 1,107 | 1,183 | 1,192 | 1,194 | 1,213 | 12% |
| Reptiles | 8,163 | 499 | 253 | 296 | 293 | 293 | 304 | 4% |
| Amphibians | 5,743 | 5,743 | 124 | 146 | 157 | 157 | 1,770 | 31% |
| Fishes | 28,500 | 1,721 | 734 | 752 | 742 | 750 | 800 | 3% |
| Subtotal | 57,739 | 22,733 | 3,314 | 3,507 | 3,521 | 3,524 | 5,188 | 9% |
| Invertebrates | ||||||||
| Insects | 950,000 | 771 | 537 | 555 | 557 | 553 | 559 | 0.06% |
| Molluscs | 70,000 | 2,163 | 920 | 938 | 939 | 967 | 974 | 1% |
| Crustaceans | 40,000 | 498 | 407 | 408 | 409 | 409 | 429 | 1% |
| Others | 130,200 | 55 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 30 | 30 | 0.02% |
| Subtotal | 1,190,200 | 3,487 | 1,891 | 1,928 | 1,932 | 1,959 | 1,992 | 0.17% |
| Source: 2004 Red List of Threatened Species (Ref 35) | ||||||||
Which ecosystems are under threat?
The Living Planet Report 2004, published by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) is an indicator of the state of the world's ecosystems. The report tracks population trends for more than 1,100 freshwater, marine and terrestrial species. Between 1970 and 2000, populations of terrestrial and marine species dropped by 30 per cent; and of freshwater species by 50 per cent. [17]
Within each of these categories, some ecosystems are more threatened than others.
Agriculture is a major contributor to loss of biodiversity. The rate at which agricultural land is expanding varies from region to region. However, much of the biodiversity loss due to agriculture is occurring in Latin America, sub-Saharan Africa and South and South-East Asia.
| Area of agricultural land by region (1900–1980) in sq km | |||
| 1900 | 1980 | % change | |
| North America | 1,330,000 | 2,030,000 | +53 |
| Latin America | 330,000 | 1,420,000 | +330 |
| Europe | 1,450,000 | 1,370,000 | -5 |
| Former USSR | 1,470,000 | 2,330,000 | +58 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 730,000 | 2,220,000 | +204 |
| South Asia | 890,000 | 2,100,000 | +136 |
| South-East Asia | 150,000 | 550,000 | +267 |
| China | 890,000 | 1,340,000 | +51 |
| Source: International Institute for Environment and Development/World Resources Institute (Ref 20 | |||
The importance of biodiversity to the functioning of ecosystems is well established. There is also, however, a considerable body of research on the economic value of biodiversity.
If one species becomes extinct, this can have a knock-on effect on others it interacts with. Indeed, an analysis published in September 2004 in the journal Science [23] suggested that the number of species globally threatened with extinction is nearly 50 per cent higher than the number currently listed as endangered. This is because the survival of 6,300 non-threatened species depends on the existence of threatened species.
Some species are — by virtue of their interactions with others — important to the continued existence of their ecosystems. These are known as 'keystone' species. The extinction of a keystone species is predicted to cause a cascade of further extinctions.
What is the economic value of biodiversity?
Individual species play a critical role in human food, medicine, biological pest control, materials (e.g. timber) and, recently, recreation. Southern Africa's wildlife, for instance, attracted more than nine million visitors in 1997, bringing in a total of US$4.1 billion to the region.
| Plant species used as food by humans | |
| Human use/classification | Plant species |
| Total described species | 250,000 |
| Edible | 30,000 |
| Cultivated | 7,000 |
| Important on national scale | 120 |
| Making up 90% of world's calories | 30 |
| Source: UN Food and Agriculture Organization (Ref 26) | |
Ten of the world's 25 top-selling drugs in 1997 were derived from natural sources. The global market value of pharmaceuticals derived from genetic resources is estimated at US$75 billion to 150 billion annually. Some 75 per cent of the world’s population rely for health care on traditional medicines, which are derived directly from natural sources. [3]
In China, for example, more than 5,000 of the estimated 30,000 identified domestic species of plants are used for medicinal purposes. More than 40 per cent of all prescriptions written in the United States contain one or more drugs that originated from wild species of fungi, bacteria, plants and animals. [26]
In addition to the importance of individual species, researchers are discovering that ecosystems, too, play an important role in providing 'services' to humans, and that these services can be given a monetary value.
In 2004, research published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, for example, showed that conserving tropical forests could increase profits for coffee farmers in Costa Rica. [24] The study showed that the closer coffee bushes are planted to patches of forest, the more and better quality beans they produce because of greater pollination by wild bees. Extra pollination provided by bees in those forest patches, increased a Costa Rican coffee farm's income by seven per cent.
Another study reveals direct and indirect financial benefits to humans from urban wetlands in Laos's That Luang Marsh. At 20 sq km, this is the largest wetland in Vientiane, and generates goods and services with an economic value in excess of US$4.8 million per year. These benefits include water purification for people who live around the marsh, as well as the residents of city as a whole. [27]
Ecological economists study the relationship between economics and ecology. In 1997, a group of ecological economists tried to estimate a value for all of the world's 'ecosystem services'. Led by Robert Costanza of the University of Maryland in the US, they calculated that the Earth provides a minimum of $16-54 trillion dollars worth of 'services' to humans per year (compared to the global total Gross National Product (GNP) of US$18 trillion). [27] The study generated considerable controversy, not least from traditional economists who remain cautious about attempts to put monetary values on ecological services.
The 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas [28] lists 102,102 sites covering 18.8 million sq km. Of the total area protected, it is estimated that 17.1 million sq km are terrestrial protected areas, or 11.5 per cent of the global land surface. Marine areas are significantly under-represented in this global system of protected areas. Approximately 1.64 million sq km comprise marine protected areas — an estimated 0.5 per cent of the world’s oceans and less than one-tenth of the overall extent of protected areas worldwide.
At least 300 critically endangered, 237 endangered and 267 vulnerable bird, mammal, turtle and amphibian species have no protection in any part of their ranges, according to the most comprehensive analysis of its kind published in Nature in 2004. [29]
What is the cost of conserving biodiversity?
A network of marine protected areas covering 20 to 30 per cent of the world's oceans would cost US$5 to 19 billion annually to run, according to research published in Bioscience in 2004. [30]
Scientists estimate that between US$20-25 billion needs to be spent annually to achieve effective global conservation. [31]
In 2002, five international organisations between them spent US$1.5 billion on conserving biodiversity. They are: the World Bank, the Global Environment Facility, the World Conservation Union (IUCN) and The Nature Conservancy. Half of this amount was spent in the United States, according to new research from a team of US university researchers and global conservation organisations. [31]
Biodiversity-related aid has been falling, according to an analysis from the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). In 1998, the DAC’s 19 members spent close to US$1.1 billion on biodiversity-related projects. This fell to a little over US$1 billion the following year; and dropped again to US$865 million in 2000. [31]
The Global Environment Facility is the main funding mechanism for the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. Donors pledged US$1.8 billion to the fund in 2002. Nearly 17 per cent of this assistance is to be spent on biodiversity-related projects. [32]
The 2010 target
At the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, the international community pledged to slow down the rate of global biodiversity loss by 2010. Member states of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity are in the process of agreeing a series of targets and indicators to help measure progress towards this target. They include: effectively conserving at least ten per cent of the world's ecological regions; improving the status of threatened species; ensuring no species of wild flora or fauna is endangered by international trade; providing new and additional financial resources and technology to developing countries to help them meet their conservation commitments.
[1] Secretariat of the Convention for Biological Diversity. (2002) Sustaining Life on Earth: How the Convention on Biological Diversity promotes nature and human well-being
[2] Arthur V. Evans, Charles L. Bellamy and Lisa Charles Watson. (2000) An Inordinate Fondness for Beetles (University of California Press)
[3] Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003)
[4] www.ctfs.si.edu/sites/summary/summary_info.htm
[5] World Resources Institute
[6] Biodiversity Hotspots/Conservation International
[7] Atlas of Population and the Environment (2001) American Association for the Advancement of Science/University of California Press
[9] May, Lawton and Stork (1995) cited in Global Environment Outlook 3
[10] Global Biodiversity Assessment (1995) UNEP/Cambridge University Press
[11] Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003)
[12] World Conservation Monitoring Centre (1992) Global Biodiversity: Status of the Earth's Living Resources (Chapman and Hall)
[13] Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003)
[14] Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003)
[16] Global Environment Outlook 3 (2003)
[17] Living Planet Report (2004) (PDF) World Wildlife Fund
[18] World Resources Institute
[19] Zoological Parks Board, Australia
[20] International Institute for Environment and Development and World Resources Institute (1987) cited by http://biodiversityeconomics.org/pdf/topics-608-00.pdf
[21] US National Aeronautics and Space Administration
[22] Achard, F. et al. (2002) ‘Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests,’ Science, 9 August 2002, 999–1,002
[23] Koh, L.P. (2004) Species coextinctions and the biodiversity crisis. Science 305: 1632-1634
[24] Ricketts, T. H., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., Michener, C. D. (2004). Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101: 12579-12582
[25] FAO. (1997) State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture
[26] Rogers, Adam, UN Environment Programme/UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service
[27] Costanza, R., R.d'Arge, R. de Groot, S. Farber, M. Grasso, B. Hannon, K. Limburg, S. Naeem, R.V. O'Neill, J. Paruelo, R.G. Raskin, P. Sutton, and M. van den Belt. (1997) ‘The values of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.’ Nature, 387, 253–260
[28] United Nations (2003) United Nations List of Protected Areas (PDF)
[29] Conservation International (PDF)
[30] Balmford, A. et al. (2001) Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? Bioscience 51, 43—52
[31] Halpern, B. S. et al. (2004) Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending (In review)
[32] Zedan, H. (2004) ‘Indicators for assessing progress towards the 2010 target’, Secretariat of UN convention on Biological Diversity 15—16.
[33] UNEP-World Conservation Monitoring Centre
[34] BBC Education
[36] Red List of Threatened Species (2004) IUCN
[37] World Resources Institute (earthtrends.wri.org/text/FOR/variables/298.htm)
[38] IUCN (2004) That Luang Marsh, Lao PDR: the importance of wetlands for urban populations
A series of articles debate key issues such as GM technology, media reporting and agricultural policymaking
Add your comment
All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.
You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.