Skip Navigation

Agriculture & Environment: Earth science

Opinions

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Tackle corruption to cut earthquake deaths

Source: Nature

18 January 2011 | EN | ES

A building destroyed by the Haiti earthquake

The Haiti earthquake killed hundreds of thousands of people

Flickr/AIDG

Countries that face corruption problems and have a history of severe earthquakes should take steps to regulate their construction industries to prevent unnecessary deaths in such disasters, argue Nicholas Ambraseys and Roger Bilham.

Over the past three decades, 83 per cent of all earthquake fatalities have occurred in poor countries that are more corrupt than is expected considering their level of income per capita, they say.

By teasing apart the effects of poverty and corruption, which often go hand in hand, their analysis shows that dishonest practices in the construction industry — regarded as the most corrupt sector globally — undermine efforts to limit the death toll in major earthquakes.

Corrupt builders may give bribes that interfere with inspection and licensing, or substitute expensive but essential parts with low-quality materials that damage the structural integrity of a building.

About a year ago, Haiti was hit by an earthquake that killed hundreds of thousands of people. A few months later, a quake of the same magnitude in New Zealand's South Island resulted in no fatalities. Ambraseys and Bilham say that careless construction and poorly enforced building codes, not geography, are to blame for turning a moderate earthquake into a major disaster.

Although buildings have become more quake-resistant over the past century, the benefits are uneven because many countries do not require the use of resistant construction designs.

But setting aside aid money to boost resistance will do little good where corruption is rife. The responsibility falls on national authorities to ensure that buildings are inspected properly, the authors say.

Link to full article in Nature

References

Nature doi: 10.1038/469153a (2011)

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Opinions
To the top