Skip Navigation

Agriculture & Environment: Agri-biotech

Features

  • Print
  • Comment
  • | Share

Roadblocks on the path to GM superfoods

Source: The Scientist

17 September 2009 | EN | 中文

Calcium-rich carrots are just one of an array of GM superfoods

Flickr/Strikkelise

GM foods engineered to contain high levels of nutrients could be a neat solution to micronutrient deficiencies in poor countries, but there are many scientific, social and political hurdles.

The UN estimates that more than half the world's population is nutrient deficient. People may consume enough calories but their food might not contain enough nutrients.

The quest to develop fortified genetically modified (GM) plants has yielded mixed results. 'Golden Rice', rich in beta-carotene, has met with anti-GM, political and technological obstacles and has yet to be widely introduced in developing countries.

Others, such as the BioCassava Plus programme which aims to develop cassava with boosted levels of iron, zinc, protein, vitamins, and resistance to plant viruses, are well underway but face similar barriers.

Other crops highlight the need for nutritional tests. A calcium-rich carrot is no use unless the calcium is effectively absorbed by the people eating it. "None of these improvements are any good until we actually show they're good in the food supply," says Kendal Hirschi, creator of calcium rich carrots.

There are also practical issues — nutrient-rich crops cost more than non-modified versions meaning that those most of in need of them cannot afford them. Hirschi is trying to do a deal with a large food company, the profits of which could fund its distribution in developing countries.

But many scientists remain confident that such obstacles will be overcome. "Biotech will, in time, become the new conventional agriculture. The question is: how long will it be until that happens," says Val Giddings, president of Prometheus Agricultural Biotech.

Comments (1)

Janet Texas ( United States of America )

21 September 2009

As you state in this article - "nutrient-rich crops cost more." Poor farmers have to buy the GM seeds and cannot save the GM seeds. They need to buy the fertilizers and pesticides needed to grow these GM crops from the seed supplier. It would appear these costs would make growing GM crops (assuming they actually do provide more nutrition) impractical for poor farmers.

Add your comment

This is your network: share your views on any of our articles by adding your comments.

You need to be signed in to post a comment or to email a consenting comment author. Please sign in or sign up.

All comments are subject to approval and we reserve the right to edit comments containing inappropriate/unsuitable language. SciDev.Net holds copyright for all material posted on the website. Please see terms of use for further details.

All SciDev.Net material is free to reproduce providing that the source and author are appropriately credited. For further details see Creative Commons.

Back to Features
To the top

<

Information Services