Bringing science and development together through news and analysis

Is the dengue vaccination worth it?
  • Is the dengue vaccination worth it?

Copyright: Lianne Milton / Panos

Speed read

  • Dengvaxia was given to half a million public school kids in the Philippines

  • Efficacy is 66 per cent for kids above 9 years but only 45 per cent for below

  • Philippine officials have launched an investigation about the vaccine’s dangers

Shares
[MANILA] The ground breaking dengue vaccine, Dengvaxia, is significantly less effective among children below 9 years old admits a Sanofi Pasteur expert.
 
Dengvaxia, developed by Sanofi Pasteur, is the world’s first dengue vaccine that offers protection on all four dengue virus types. But while it is effective against four strains, its efficacy differs among age groups.
 
In an interview, Alain Bouckenooghe, associate vice president and regional head of clinical R&D Sanofi Pasteur, tells SciDev.Net that based on their findings, efficacy in children younger than 9 years old is way lower than those vaccinated in ages 9 and above.
 
According to Sanofi test results, vaccination in children ages 9-16 is able to reduced risk of hospitalisation by almost 81 per cent while efficacy against the four strains is at 66 per cent. But this drops to 56 per cent on reduced risk of hospitalisation and 45 per cent efficacy for kids below 9 years of age.
 
This result is crucial since below nine years of age are the most vulnerable age group to dengue and many kids already had been infected with at least one or two strains by the time they reach 9 years old. This means those who had been exposed to dengue would be vaccinated for just one to three strains at the same vaccination cost.
 
Earlier this year the World Health Organization supported the vaccination against dengue in countries with high incidence. Several countries have expressed interest in using Dengvaxia mostly in Latin America, with the Philippines becoming the first country to use the vaccine when it immunised 489,000 public school children in April. Last October it administered the second of the three-dose vaccine.
 
When pressed by SciDev.Net if he will recommend to health officials to exclude kids that already had two or three strains of dengue in the vaccination course to cut government expenses, Bouckenooghe says the company is leaving the decision to individual governments on what to recommend.
 
The dengue vaccination program in the Philippines is currently under congressional scrutiny over its reported dangers and irregularities.
 
Philippine Senator Richard Gordon, who is also the long-time chair of the Philippine Red Cross, recently brought up in a Senate privilege speech about the dangers of Dengvaxia.
 
In an interview with SciDev.Net, Senator Gordon says he is questioning the hasty way the vaccination was decided and is calling for a senate inquiry through its anti-graft body, the blue ribbon committee which he chairs, to determine if there are irregularities.
 
“The timing is very suspicious. It was done near the end of the previous administration. There are reports that people have gotten sick and died,” he says.
According to Sanofi, of the almost half a million kids vaccinated only 27 had serious side effects while 2 reportedly died which to their investigation is just coincidental and not related to the vaccine.
 
One of those who died, an 11-year old boy, had a congenital heart disease and died days after receiving the vaccine.
 
“We want to find out if extreme diligence has been done. An awful lots of money were put in and exceedingly facilitated for a vaccine which made the Philippines the first user in the world, which is disconcerting,” Gordon says.
 
Some Php3.5 billion (US$150 million) were budgeted for the dengue vaccination which he emphases is good for vaccinating against six different diseases already.
 
“If this were put on dental services, it would have serviced already 96 per cent of the people,” a disappointed Gordon says.
 
 This piece was produced by SciDev.Net’s South-East Asia & Pacific desk.
Republish
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.