Bringing science and development together through news and analysis

Asian power stations blamed for mercury toxicity in fish
  • Asian power stations blamed for mercury toxicity in fish

Copyright: Flickr/USACE

Speed read

  • Study reveals how mercury builds up in fish through deep ocean feeding

  • Toxic mercury is likely to have come from coal plants in Asia, study's author says

  • As coal-fired energy production increases, mercury in fish will also rise

Shares
[MANILA] Coal-fired power stations in emerging economies in Asia could be responsible for rising mercury levels in fish, says one of the authors of a study that looked at how mercury builds up in North Pacific fish.

He warns that as countries like China and India expand their reliance on coal-fired energy production — a major source of mercury pollution — mercury levels in deep ocean fish could increase drastically.

The study, published in Nature Geoscience last month (25 August), says that 80 per cent of methylmercury (a highly toxic form of mercury) is produced deep in the ocean, rather than at surface level, as was previously thought.

A 2009 study reported that fish that feed at deeper levels of the open ocean, like opah and swordfish, have higher mercury concentrations than surface feeders like mahi-mahi, but until now it was not known why.

The fish species analysed in the new study by researchers from the University of Michigan and the University of Hawaii, in the United States, are flying fish, mahi-mahi, yellowfin tuna, skipjack tuna, moonfish (opah), bigeye tuna, swordfish, and two species of lantern fish. These fish feed at different ocean levels, enabling scientists to compare fish tissue mercury toxicity found at different depths.

Mercury can stay in the atmosphere for up to a year. The type of mercury found in the nine fish species analysed is capable of travelling globally before entering the ocean through rainfall. It then builds up — or bioaccumulates — in the tissues of larger marine fish when they consume smaller fish containing mercury, in a process known as biomagnification.

Prior to the study it was thought that the conversion of inorganic mercury by anaerobic bacteria into its highly toxic form happens in the surface of the ocean.

The study estimates that up to 80 per cent of methylmercury detected below the ocean's surface mixed layer — 165 metres or deeper  — where sunlight does not penetrate, is produced by methylating microbes that live on sinking particles of dead plant and animal matter, which deep-feeding fish then consume. 

The results shed light on how predatory fish that feed at deeper levels in the open ocean show higher mercury concentrations than those that feed in waters near the surface.

"We now know that depth of feeding is an important indicator of mercury levels in fish, as well as trophic position [food chain level], size and age. In general, fish caught at shallower water are better [for consumption]," says Joel Blum, the study's lead author and a professor of earth and environmental sciences at the University of Michigan. 

The main pathway for methylmercury entering humans is through eating marine fish. People who regularly consume contaminated fish are at risk of damage to the central nervous system, heart and immune system, says Blum. Consuming contaminated fish can also hinder brain development among the young.

Blum thinks that methylmercury levels will increase in the coming years as energy demands and coal-fired production increase.  

And, although the paper does not specifically blame China and India, the authors say that the location of the tested fish, downwind from these countries, strongly implies that coal-based industrialisation is a significant contributing factor. 

"If we're going to effectively reduce mercury concentrations in open-ocean fish, we're going to have to reduce global emissions of mercury, including emissions from places like China and India," says Blum.

"This is a global atmospheric problem and we need to put emissions control devices on all coal-fired power plants, incinerators and other sources of mercury to the atmosphere," he adds.

And Gregg Yan, spokesman for the World Wide Fund for Nature says that stopping the pollution of oceans by turning to green renewable energy sources such as solar and wind is key to keeping fishes safe to eat.  

Link to the full paper in Nature Geoscience

References

Nature Geoscience doi:10.1038/ngeo1918 (2013)
Republish
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.