Bringing science and development together through news and analysis

  • Earthquake cause for mud volcanoes draws criticism

Image credit: Flickr/neigborhoods.org

Speed read

  • An erupting mudflow in Lusi has inundated 13 villages and displaced 30,000 people since May 2006

  • A study published this month in Nature Geoscience shows seismic waves triggered the disaster

  • But a prominent Indonesian geologist maintains that gas drilling is to blame

[JAKARTA] A fresh study of the Lusi mud volcanoes in East Java, which began erupting in May 2006, concludes that the disaster was caused by a natural phenomenon, but has been met with widespread public scepticism in Indonesia, with one prominent local geologist questioning its validity.

According to the study, published in Nature Geoscience on 21 July, the mud eruption was caused by seismic waves that travelled from Yogyakarta earthquake in Java, Indonesia, two days prior to the eruption.

But careless gas drilling has also been blamed for the mudflow (see Scientists say drilling caused Indonesian mudflow) that continues to spew boiling mud, inundating 13 villages and displacing over 30,000 residents. Some experts believe it will continue to erupt for decades.

The study's authors used computer simulation to see how seismic waves from the Yogyakarta earthquake interacted with rock formations in Lusi. The specific shape of these rock formations can reflect and amplify the waves.

"This amplified energy then focused into the mud layer which liquefied the mud," says Stephen Miller, of the University of Bonn in Germany, who coordinated the study. The liquefied mud then seeped into a crack and erupted to the surface.

But Bagus Endar Bachtiar, an Indonesian geologist from Bandung Institute of Technology, Indonesia, who has been researching the Lusi disaster, dismissed the theory.

"It is impossible that Lusi was caused by a Yogyakarta seismic wave. If it is because of the rock formation below Lusi, why did the mud volcanoes only happen in Lusi? Why not anywhere else in between Yogyakarta and Lusi? All those areas have the same geological rock formation like Lusi. They should behave the same way. But they didn't," says Bagus.

Another geologist, Richard Davies from UK-based Durham University, believes the mud eruption was caused by drilling. Last year, a team of international scientists from France, Indonesia and Norway also blamed the disaster on drilling.

The case is a sensitive issue in Indonesia because the company behind the drilling, Lapindo Brantas Inc., has refused to accept responsibility for the disaster and to compensate victims. It is a majority-owned by a powerful politician, Abu Rizal Bakrie, who is seen as a possible presidential candidate.

Some Indonesians think Miller and his colleagues' research is done to support Lapindo Brantas.

But Miller says the authors have no financial interest in the study's results.

"I can understand their scepticism. But our interest is in the science and we have zero financial interest," he says.

Rachel Twinn, a senior press officer for Nature Publishing Group, emphasises that Miller's research passed the peer-review procedure and met all criteria for publication, such as providing strong evidence for its conclusion.

Link to the full text in Nature Geoscience   Mudslide_Indonesia_study

This article has been produced by SciDev.Net's South-East Asia & Pacific desk.

References

Nature Geoscience doi:10.1038/ngeo1884 (2013)
Republish
We encourage you to republish this article online and in print, it’s free under our creative commons attribution license, but please follow some simple guidelines:
  1. You have to credit our authors.
  2. You have to credit SciDev.Net — where possible include our logo with a link back to the original article.
  3. You can simply run the first few lines of the article and then add: “Read the full article on SciDev.Net” containing a link back to the original article.
  4. If you want to also take images published in this story you will need to confirm with the original source if you're licensed to use them.
  5. The easiest way to get the article on your site is to embed the code below.
For more information view our media page and republishing guidelines.